N@N

War of words erupts over Western Australia's prescribed burning program

The article discusses a contentious debate over Western Australia's prescribed burning program, which aims to reduce the risk of uncontrolled bushfires by intentionally setting controlled fires. The program has sparked a "war of words" between environmentalists and fire management authorities. Critics, including environmental groups, argue that the burns are too frequent and extensive, potentially damaging biodiversity and not effectively reducing fire risk as claimed. They point out that these burns can destroy habitats and release significant amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. On the other hand, the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) defends the program, stating it's crucial for protecting lives, property, and ecosystems from catastrophic wildfires. The DBCA insists that their methods are based on scientific research and are necessary given the increasing fire risk due to climate change. The debate has intensified with calls for a more balanced approach that considers both fire safety and environmental conservation.

Read the Full MSN Article at:
[ https://www.msn.com/en-au/public-safety-and-emergencies/health-and-safety-alerts/war-of-words-erupts-over-western-australia-s-prescribed-burning-program/ar-BB1rkkKo ]