Science & Technology
Thu, July 24, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Live Science
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Defense News
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: CNET
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: yahoo.com
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: London Evening Standard
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The 74
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Ukrayinska Pravda
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Rhode Island Current
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Decatur Daily, Ala.
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Foreign Policy
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Florida Today
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: MassLive
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Business Today
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Cool Down
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: WFXT
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Newsweek
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Associated Press Finance
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Straits Times
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Sun
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Forbes
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: BBC
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: WFTV
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: TechCrunch
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Michigan Daily
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Fox News
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: moneycontrol.com
Wed, July 23, 2025
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: People
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Today
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: ABC News
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WESH
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: ABC
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Politico
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: yahoo.com
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Atlanta Journal-Constitution
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Motley Fool
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: reuters.com
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Telangana Today
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Fox News
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Newsweek
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Medscape
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Scotsman
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Deseret News
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Forbes
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: KWCH
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: ThePrint
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: New Jersey Monitor
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Daily Express
Tue, July 22, 2025
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Fox 13
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: CNBC
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Forbes
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Hill
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: KBTX
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Detroit News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Fox News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Independent
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: NBC DFW
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Phys.org
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Post-Bulletin, Rochester, Minn.
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: STAT
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Associated Press
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Newsweek
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Space.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Channel 3000
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Tacoma News Tribune
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The 74
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Orlando Sentinel
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Auburn Citizen
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Impacts
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: BBC
Mon, July 21, 2025
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: AFP
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: ESPN
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: al.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: WFRV Green Bay
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Organic Authority
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Fox News
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: gadgets360
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: CNN
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: USA TODAY
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: NBC New York
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: CBS News
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: NJ.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Reuters
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Stateline
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Philadelphia Inquirer
Sun, July 20, 2025
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The New Indian Express
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: ABC
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Pacific Daily News
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Cool Down
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: New Hampshire Union Leader
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: reuters.com
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Chowhound
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: KSNF Joplin
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Atlantic
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: WFTV
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: CBS News
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Daily Dot
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Backyard Garden Lover
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Forbes
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Jerusalem Post Blogs
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Impacts
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Citizen
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Business Today
Sat, July 19, 2025
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: WILX-TV
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: thedirect.com
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The New Indian Express
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Killeen Daily Herald
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: gizmodo.com
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: CBS News
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Forbes
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: ThePrint
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Daily Record
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Daily Star
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Raw Story
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Salon
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Cool Down
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Motley Fool
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Jerusalem Post Blogs
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Economist
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Hans India
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Boston Globe
Fri, July 18, 2025
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Forbes
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: WDIO
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Wyoming News
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Tasting Table
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: yahoo.com
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The New York Times
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Patch
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: St. Joseph News-Press, Mo.
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: London Evening Standard
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Action News Jax
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: HuffPost
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Impacts
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: CBS News
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: STAT
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: GamesRadar+
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: USA TODAY
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The Hill
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Futurism
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Business Insider
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: KIRO-TV
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: BBC
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Phys.org
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: rnz
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The New Indian Express
Thu, July 17, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: WTVD
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Tim Hastings
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: ABC
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Impacts
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Le Monde.fr
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Forbes
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: gizmodo.com
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Boston Globe
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: thetimes.com
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Globe and Mail
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Daily Signal
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Fox Business
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: deseret
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: federalnewsnetwork.com
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Daily Mail
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: rnz
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Toronto Star
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: TechSpot
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: TheWrap
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: Houston Public Media
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Independent US
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: London Evening Standard
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: breitbart.com
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Cool Down
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: ThePrint
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The Independent
[ Thu, Jul 17th ]: The New Zealand Herald
Mon, July 14, 2025
[ Mon, Jul 14th ]: TechRadar
[ Mon, Jul 14th ]: gadgets360
[ Mon, Jul 14th ]: Patch
[ Mon, Jul 14th ]: Hackaday
Sun, July 13, 2025
[ Sun, Jul 13th ]: People
[ Sun, Jul 13th ]: WPXI
[ Sun, Jul 13th ]: BBC
Sat, July 12, 2025
[ Sat, Jul 12th ]: BBC
[ Sat, Jul 12th ]: CNET
[ Sat, Jul 12th ]: YourTango
Fri, July 11, 2025
How AI is shaking up scientific publishing
//science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. /how-ai-is-shaking-up-scientific-publishing.html
Published in Science and Technology on Thursday, July 17th 2025 at 20:41 GMT by Le Monde.fr🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
On top of the usual cases of fraud and malpractice, artificial intelligence is sowing discord and transforming the world of academic publishing.
One of the most notable impacts of AI in scientific publishing is its ability to streamline and accelerate various stages of the research and publication process. AI tools are increasingly being used to assist researchers in drafting manuscripts, analyzing data, and even identifying potential research gaps. Language models, for instance, can generate coherent summaries of complex studies or suggest improvements to academic writing, making it easier for non-native speakers to publish in international journals. These tools can also help in formatting papers according to specific journal guidelines, saving researchers significant time and effort. Beyond writing, AI algorithms are capable of sifting through vast datasets to uncover patterns or correlations that might elude human researchers, thus enhancing the depth and scope of scientific inquiry. This capacity to process and interpret large volumes of information at high speed is particularly valuable in fields like genomics, climate science, and epidemiology, where data complexity is a major hurdle.
However, the integration of AI into scientific publishing is not without controversy, particularly when it comes to the generation of research content. The use of AI to produce entire sections of papers—or even full articles—has sparked debates about authorship and accountability. If a machine writes a significant portion of a study, who should be credited as the author? Should AI systems be listed as co-authors, or should their contributions be treated merely as tools akin to statistical software? This ambiguity poses a challenge to the traditional notion of intellectual ownership in academia. Moreover, there is a growing concern about the potential for AI-generated content to introduce errors or biases into published research. AI models are trained on existing datasets, which may contain inaccuracies or reflect historical biases. If these flaws are not identified and corrected, they could perpetuate misinformation or skewed perspectives in the scientific literature, undermining the reliability of published work.
Another area where AI is making waves is in the peer review process, a cornerstone of scientific publishing that ensures the quality and validity of research before it reaches the public. AI systems are being developed to assist editors and reviewers by flagging potential issues in manuscripts, such as methodological flaws, plagiarism, or inconsistencies in data. Some platforms use AI to match submitted papers with suitable reviewers based on expertise and past publications, thereby improving the efficiency of the review process. In certain cases, AI tools can even provide preliminary assessments of a paper’s quality, helping to triage submissions and reduce the burden on human reviewers. While these advancements promise to make peer review faster and more objective, they also raise questions about the role of human judgment in evaluating scientific merit. Critics argue that AI lacks the nuanced understanding and contextual awareness that human reviewers bring to the table, potentially leading to oversights or misjudgments. There is also the risk of over-reliance on automated systems, which could erode the critical thinking and skepticism that are essential to rigorous scientific evaluation.
The rise of AI in scientific publishing has also intensified concerns about research integrity and the proliferation of fraudulent or low-quality content. The ease with which AI can generate plausible-sounding text has led to fears of an increase in fabricated studies or "paper mills"—operations that produce fake research papers for profit. These papers, often filled with nonsensical or plagiarized content, can slip through traditional review processes, especially in less rigorous journals, and pollute the scientific record. AI tools can exacerbate this problem by enabling bad actors to produce convincing forgeries at scale. To counter this, some publishers are turning to AI itself as a solution, developing algorithms to detect signs of fraud, such as unnatural language patterns or inconsistencies in data. However, this cat-and-mouse game between AI-generated fraud and AI-powered detection underscores the broader challenge of maintaining trust in scientific publishing in the digital age.
Ethical considerations extend beyond fraud to the broader implications of AI’s role in shaping research priorities and access to knowledge. AI systems, often developed by private companies, may prioritize certain types of research or methodologies based on commercial interests or the biases embedded in their training data. This could skew the scientific agenda, marginalizing less profitable or underrepresented fields of study. Additionally, the use of AI in publishing raises questions about equity and accessibility. While AI tools can democratize research by lowering barriers to entry—such as helping researchers with limited resources to write and publish—they can also exacerbate inequalities if access to cutting-edge AI technologies is restricted to well-funded institutions or individuals. The cost of subscribing to AI-powered platforms or services could create a two-tier system, where only those with financial means can fully leverage these tools, leaving others at a disadvantage.
The advent of AI is also prompting a rethinking of how scientific knowledge is disseminated and consumed. Traditional publishing models, centered around subscription-based journals, are being challenged by the possibilities of AI-driven open-access platforms. AI can facilitate the creation of dynamic, interactive research outputs that go beyond static PDFs, incorporating real-time data updates, visualizations, and user-driven queries. Such innovations could make research more accessible and engaging to a wider audience, including policymakers, educators, and the general public. However, they also require significant investment in infrastructure and raise concerns about data privacy and the security of sensitive research information. Furthermore, the sheer volume of content that AI can help produce and disseminate risks overwhelming readers and diluting the visibility of high-quality work. The challenge lies in ensuring that AI enhances, rather than undermines, the discoverability and impact of meaningful research.
As AI continues to evolve, its integration into scientific publishing will likely deepen, necessitating new frameworks for governance and oversight. Stakeholders—including researchers, publishers, funding agencies, and policymakers—must collaborate to establish guidelines that address the ethical, technical, and social implications of AI in academia. This includes developing standards for transparency, such as requiring authors to disclose the use of AI tools in their work, and fostering education on the responsible use of these technologies. Journals and institutions may need to adapt their policies on authorship, peer review, and publication ethics to account for AI’s growing influence. At the same time, there is a need for ongoing dialogue about the balance between innovation and integrity, ensuring that AI serves as a tool to advance human knowledge rather than compromise it.
In conclusion, AI is shaking up scientific publishing in ways that are both transformative and complex. It offers the potential to enhance efficiency, broaden access, and push the boundaries of research, but it also poses significant risks to the credibility and fairness of the scientific enterprise. Navigating this dual reality requires a careful, proactive approach that embraces the benefits of AI while addressing its challenges head-on. As the technology continues to advance, the academic community must remain vigilant, ensuring that the pursuit of knowledge remains grounded in rigor, ethics, and a commitment to the public good. The future of scientific publishing in the age of AI is not yet written, but it is clear that its trajectory will shape the way we understand and engage with the world for generations to come.
Read the Full Le Monde.fr Article at:
[ https://www.lemonde.fr/en/science/article/2025/07/12/how-ai-is-shaking-up-scientific-publishing_6743308_10.html ]
Similar Science and Technology Publications
