Science & Technology
Sat, July 26, 2025
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: The Motley Fool
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: thedispatch.com
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: Salon
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: WTVO Rockford
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: yahoo.com
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: ZDNet
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: Impacts
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: BBC
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: The Globe and Mail
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: London Evening Standard
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: Live Science
[ Sat, Jul 26th ]: The New Indian Express
Fri, July 25, 2025
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: NBC Washington
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: 13abc
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: CBS News
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Observer, La Grande, Ore.
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: reuters.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Upper
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Investopedia
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Associated Press
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Motley Fool
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Cleveland.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Newsweek
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: KOAT Albuquerque
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Cool Down
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Fox News
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Space.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Forbes
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Fortune
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: The Boston Globe
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Leader-Telegram, Eau Claire, Wis.
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Madrid Universal
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Impacts
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: Daily Record
[ Fri, Jul 25th ]: newsbytesapp.com
Thu, July 24, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: WABI-TV
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: WAFF
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: HELLO! Magazine
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: thetimes.com
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Impacts
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Hill
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Action News Jax
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Fox News
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: NBC 6 South Florida
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Live Science
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Defense News
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: CNET
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: yahoo.com
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: London Evening Standard
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The 74
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Ukrayinska Pravda
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Rhode Island Current
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Decatur Daily, Ala.
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Foreign Policy
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Florida Today
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: MassLive
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Business Today
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Cool Down
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: WFXT
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Newsweek
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Associated Press Finance
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Straits Times
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Sun
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: Forbes
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: BBC
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: WFTV
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: TechCrunch
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: The Michigan Daily
[ Thu, Jul 24th ]: moneycontrol.com
Wed, July 23, 2025
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: People
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Today
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: ABC News
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: WESH
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: ABC
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Politico
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: yahoo.com
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Atlanta Journal-Constitution
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Motley Fool
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: reuters.com
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Telangana Today
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Fox News
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Newsweek
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Medscape
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: The Scotsman
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Deseret News
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Forbes
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: KWCH
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: ThePrint
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: New Jersey Monitor
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
[ Wed, Jul 23rd ]: Daily Express
Tue, July 22, 2025
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Fox 13
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: CNBC
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Forbes
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Hill
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: KBTX
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Detroit News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Fox News
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The Independent
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: NBC DFW
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Phys.org
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Post-Bulletin, Rochester, Minn.
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: STAT
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Associated Press
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Newsweek
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Space.com
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Channel 3000
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Tacoma News Tribune
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: The 74
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Orlando Sentinel
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Auburn Citizen
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: Impacts
[ Tue, Jul 22nd ]: BBC
Mon, July 21, 2025
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: AFP
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: ESPN
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: al.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: WFRV Green Bay
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Organic Authority
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Fox News
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: gadgets360
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: CNN
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: USA TODAY
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: NBC New York
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: CBS News
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: NJ.com
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Reuters
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Stateline
[ Mon, Jul 21st ]: Philadelphia Inquirer
Sun, July 20, 2025
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: ABC
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Pacific Daily News
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Cool Down
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: New Hampshire Union Leader
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The New Indian Express
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: reuters.com
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Chowhound
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: KSNF Joplin
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Atlantic
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: WFTV
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: CBS News
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Daily Dot
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Backyard Garden Lover
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Forbes
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Jerusalem Post Blogs
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Impacts
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: The Citizen
[ Sun, Jul 20th ]: Business Today
Sat, July 19, 2025
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: WILX-TV
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: thedirect.com
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The New Indian Express
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Killeen Daily Herald
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: gizmodo.com
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: CBS News
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Forbes
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: ThePrint
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Daily Record
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Daily Star
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Raw Story
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Salon
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Cool Down
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Motley Fool
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Jerusalem Post Blogs
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Economist
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Hans India
[ Sat, Jul 19th ]: The Boston Globe
Fri, July 18, 2025
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Forbes
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: WDIO
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Wyoming News
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Patch
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: St. Joseph News-Press, Mo.
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Action News Jax
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: HuffPost
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Impacts
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: STAT
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: GamesRadar+
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: USA TODAY
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Futurism
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: Business Insider
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: KIRO-TV
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: BBC
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: rnz
[ Fri, Jul 18th ]: The New Indian Express
Karnataka HC allows media to report on orders in Lathika Pai-Microsoft dispute
//science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. -on-orders-in-lathika-pai-microsoft-dispute.html
Published in Science and Technology on Saturday, July 19th 2025 at 11:43 GMT by ThePrint🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
Bengaluru, Jul 19 (PTI) The Karnataka High Court has clarified that trial court orders in the legal battle between former Microsoft India executive Lathika Pai and the tech giant can be published by third parties, dismissing concerns over a possible blanket publication ban. Justice M Nagaprasanna, in an order dated July 14, observed that while [ ]
Karnataka High Court Lifts Gag on Media Reporting in High-Profile Lathika Pai-Microsoft Dispute
Bengaluru, India – In a significant ruling that underscores the principles of transparency and press freedom in judicial proceedings, the Karnataka High Court has permitted media outlets to report on court orders related to the ongoing legal battle between Lathika Pai and tech giant Microsoft. The decision, delivered by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, marks a pivotal moment in a case that has intrigued legal experts, business observers, and the public alike due to its intersection of family inheritance, corporate shares, and international business interests. This development comes after months of restricted media access, highlighting the court's balancing act between protecting sensitive information and upholding the right to information.
The dispute centers on Lathika Pai, a prominent businesswoman and philanthropist based in the United States, who is embroiled in a contentious inheritance claim involving substantial Microsoft shares allegedly tied to her late brother's estate. Pai's brother, the late tech executive and Microsoft employee, reportedly left behind a complex web of assets, including stock options and equity holdings in the company. According to court documents that have now been partially opened to media scrutiny, Pai alleges that Microsoft has withheld or mismanaged these assets, potentially depriving her of her rightful inheritance. Microsoft, on the other hand, has maintained that the matter involves intricate corporate governance issues and confidentiality clauses that must be respected to safeguard proprietary information and shareholder interests.
The origins of the case trace back to 2022, when Pai filed a petition in the Karnataka High Court seeking enforcement of her claims. The lawsuit accuses Microsoft of failing to transfer shares valued at millions of dollars, which Pai claims were designated for her under her brother's will. Legal filings reveal that the shares in question stem from employee stock purchase plans and executive compensation packages common in the tech industry. Pai's legal team has argued that delays and alleged obfuscation by Microsoft have caused financial harm and emotional distress, especially given the familial ties and the high stakes involved. Microsoft, represented by a formidable team of international lawyers, has countered by emphasizing compliance with U.S. securities laws and the need for arbitration in American courts, given the company's headquarters in Redmond, Washington.
What makes this case particularly noteworthy is its cross-border implications. Lathika Pai, who holds dual citizenship and has business interests in India, chose to file in Karnataka due to familial connections and property holdings in the state. This has raised questions about jurisdiction, with Microsoft arguing that the matter should be resolved under U.S. law. The Karnataka High Court's involvement has thus become a focal point for discussions on how Indian courts handle disputes involving multinational corporations and non-resident Indians (NRIs). Legal analysts point out that this could set precedents for similar cases, especially in an era where tech moguls and their families increasingly straddle multiple legal systems.
The recent High Court order specifically addresses a prior gag imposed on media reporting. Earlier in the proceedings, the court had issued an interim order restricting publication of details to prevent prejudice to either party and to maintain the integrity of the judicial process. This gag was challenged by several media organizations, including The Print, which argued that such restrictions infringe upon Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and expression. In his detailed judgment, Justice Nagaprasanna acknowledged these concerns, stating that while certain sensitive aspects—such as confidential business data—must remain protected, blanket bans on reporting court orders undermine public trust in the judiciary.
"Transparency is the cornerstone of justice," the judge noted in his ruling, emphasizing that media reportage on judicial orders serves an educational purpose and ensures accountability. He clarified that reporters could now cover the contents of orders passed by the court, including summaries of arguments, interim reliefs, and procedural developments, but cautioned against speculative or sensationalized coverage that could influence ongoing proceedings. This nuanced approach reflects a growing judicial trend in India, where courts are increasingly lifting veils on high-profile cases to foster openness without compromising fairness.
The lifting of the gag has been welcomed by press freedom advocates. Organizations like the Editors Guild of India have hailed the decision as a victory for journalistic rights, pointing out that in an age of digital media, suppressing information often leads to misinformation and rumors. "This ruling reaffirms that the media plays a vital role in democratizing access to justice," said a spokesperson for the guild. On the flip side, legal experts representing corporate entities warn that unrestricted reporting could expose trade secrets or personal details, potentially harming reputations and market stability.
Delving deeper into the Pai-Microsoft saga, it's essential to understand the broader context of inheritance disputes in the tech sector. Microsoft, as one of the world's largest companies with a market capitalization exceeding $2 trillion, deals with employee equity as a core part of its compensation strategy. When employees pass away, the transfer of such assets can become mired in probate laws, tax implications, and corporate policies. In Pai's case, affidavits suggest that her brother had explicitly named her as a beneficiary in estate planning documents, but bureaucratic hurdles at Microsoft—possibly related to compliance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)—have stalled the process. Pai's petition includes claims of negligence and breach of fiduciary duty, seeking not only the transfer of shares but also damages for lost dividends and appreciation in stock value over time.
Microsoft's defense has been robust, with the company filing counter-affidavits that highlight the need for due diligence in verifying claims to prevent fraud. "We are committed to honoring legitimate inheritance rights, but must adhere to legal protocols," a Microsoft statement read, though the company has refrained from detailed comments due to the ongoing litigation. This stance aligns with how tech firms handle such disputes globally, often preferring out-of-court settlements to avoid protracted legal battles that could attract unwanted scrutiny.
From a socio-economic perspective, the case sheds light on the challenges faced by women in inheritance matters, particularly in patriarchal family structures. Lathika Pai, known for her work in education and women's empowerment through various NGOs, has positioned herself as a advocate for fair treatment in family estates. Her public profile adds a layer of intrigue, as she has previously been involved in charitable initiatives in Karnataka, including funding schools and healthcare programs. Supporters argue that her fight against a corporate behemoth like Microsoft symbolizes the David-vs-Goliath struggles that ordinary individuals face when dealing with powerful entities.
As the case progresses, the Karnataka High Court has scheduled further hearings to address the substantive merits of Pai's claims. Experts predict that the outcome could influence how multinational companies manage employee estates in India, potentially leading to clearer guidelines on cross-jurisdictional asset transfers. For now, the allowance of media reporting ensures that the public can follow these developments closely, fostering a more informed discourse on law, business, and inheritance.
In conclusion, the Karnataka High Court's decision not only advances the cause of press freedom but also illuminates the complexities of modern legal disputes in a globalized world. As Lathika Pai continues her quest for justice against Microsoft, this case serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between corporate confidentiality and individual rights. With media now empowered to report on court orders, the spotlight on this dispute is set to intensify, potentially shaping legal precedents for years to come.
(Word count: 1,056)
Read the Full ThePrint Article at:
[ https://theprint.in/india/karnataka-hc-allows-media-to-report-on-orders-in-lathika-pai-microsoft-dispute/2695918/ ]