14 current technologies people hope will seem ridiculous in 50 years

Published in Science and Technology on Sunday, July 20th 2025 at 9:43 GMT by The Daily Dot
^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Will we laugh at these in 2075?

Technologies of Today That Will Seem Utterly Ridiculous in 50 Years

In an era where technological advancement accelerates at a breakneck pace, it's fascinating to pause and reflect on the gadgets, systems, and habits that define our daily lives. What feels cutting-edge now might one day be viewed with the same bemused nostalgia we reserve for rotary phones, floppy disks, or fax machines. Drawing from cultural observations and forward-thinking speculation, this exploration delves into several pieces of current technology that could appear downright absurd to future generations. By examining these elements, we gain insight into how innovation reshapes not just our tools, but our very perceptions of normalcy. Let's break down some prime candidates, exploring why they might evoke laughter or disbelief in the year 2074.

First on the list is the ubiquitous password system. Today, we juggle dozens of alphanumeric codes, often laced with special characters and case sensitivities, to access everything from email accounts to banking apps. We reset them frequently, curse under our breath at forgotten combinations, and rely on password managers that are essentially digital vaults for our secrets. But imagine a world where biometric authentication—think advanced retinal scans, neural implants, or even DNA-based verification—has rendered passwords obsolete. In 50 years, the idea of typing "P@ssw0rd123" into a login screen might seem as primitive as chiseling hieroglyphs into stone tablets. Future historians could chuckle at how we entrusted our digital security to easily hackable strings of characters, vulnerable to phishing scams and brute-force attacks. The sheer inefficiency of it all—spending minutes each day authenticating ourselves manually—would highlight a bygone era of technological clumsiness. Moreover, the environmental footprint of server farms dedicated to storing and verifying these passwords could be seen as a wasteful relic, especially in a hyper-efficient, AI-driven future where identity is seamlessly integrated into our biology.

Closely related is the CAPTCHA test, those infuriating puzzles that force us to prove we're not robots by identifying traffic lights in blurry images or typing distorted text. Designed to thwart bots and spam, CAPTCHAs have become a staple of online interactions, from signing up for newsletters to posting comments. Yet, in half a century, as artificial intelligence evolves to indistinguishable levels from human cognition, these tests might appear comically outdated. Why bother with visual riddles when quantum computing and neural networks could verify humanity through behavioral patterns or subconscious data streams? Future users might view CAPTCHAs as a quirky artifact of the early internet age, akin to how we now laugh at the screeching modems of dial-up connections. The time wasted globally on these micro-tasks—estimated in billions of hours annually—would underscore a period when technology hadn't yet outsmarted its own safeguards, leading to widespread frustration and accessibility issues for those with visual impairments.

Shifting gears to transportation, consider the manually driven, gasoline-powered automobile. In 2024, most of us still grip steering wheels, pump fossil fuels, and navigate traffic jams with varying degrees of road rage. Electric vehicles are gaining traction, but the dominance of internal combustion engines persists. Fast-forward 50 years, and autonomous, flying, or hyperloop-based transport could make our current cars look like horse-drawn carriages. The notion of humans piloting two-ton metal boxes at high speeds, prone to accidents caused by distraction or error, would seem recklessly archaic. Environmentalists of the future might scoff at the carbon emissions we tolerated, viewing gas stations as polluting dinosaurs. Safety statistics alone—millions of annual road deaths worldwide—would paint our era as one of unnecessary risk, especially when AI-driven vehicles could eliminate human error entirely. Even the cultural rituals, like learning to parallel park or dealing with flat tires, might become fodder for holographic history lessons, evoking pity for our "primitive" mobility.

Another contender is the wired charger. We plug in our smartphones, laptops, and earbuds nightly, often fumbling with tangled cords and incompatible ports. Wireless charging exists but isn't universal, and battery life remains a constant anxiety. By 2074, with advancements in energy harvesting—perhaps from ambient sources like body heat, solar fabrics, or even atmospheric electricity—physical plugs could be relics. Imagine explaining to a grandchild why we had to "juice up" devices like vampires siphoning power from walls. The inefficiency of lithium-ion batteries, with their limited cycles and mining impacts, would highlight an era before sustainable, self-replenishing energy became the norm. This shift could extend to a world where devices are perpetually powered, making the act of searching for an outlet as obsolete as winding a mechanical watch.

Social media platforms, as they exist today, might also draw future ridicule. We scroll endlessly through feeds curated by algorithms, liking posts, sharing memes, and engaging in virtual arguments with strangers. Platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter (now X) dominate our attention, often at the expense of mental health and privacy. In 50 years, immersive virtual realities or direct brain-to-brain communication could render these 2D interfaces laughable. The idea of typing thoughts into a screen, only to have them manipulated by corporate algorithms for ad revenue, might seem like a dystopian farce. Future societies could view our obsession with "likes" and follower counts as a psychological crutch, akin to how we now see chain-smoking in the 1950s. The data privacy scandals and misinformation epidemics of our time would serve as cautionary tales, with historians pondering why we willingly surrendered our personal information to profit-driven entities.

Physical keys and locks deserve a mention too. We carry jangling keychains for homes, cars, and offices, occasionally locking ourselves out or duplicating spares at hardware stores. Biometric locks are emerging, but traditional keys remain standard. In a future of smart homes integrated with AI butlers and instantaneous access via thought commands, metal keys could symbolize an insecure past. The vulnerability to picking, losing, or theft would make them seem comically unreliable, much like how we view medieval drawbridges today. This extends to broader security paradigms, where physical barriers give way to digital fortresses.

Television sets, those bulky screens we mount on walls or place on stands, might evolve into something unrecognizable. Streaming services have already disrupted cable, but the concept of a dedicated "TV" device could fade as holographic projections or augmented reality overlays become commonplace. Watching shows on a fixed rectangle, interrupted by ads or limited by resolution, would feel constraining compared to immersive, interactive experiences that blend entertainment with real life.

Finally, the smartphone itself—the pocket-sized computer that rules our lives—could be seen as a transitional artifact. We tap glass screens, deal with cracks and updates, and carry them everywhere. In 50 years, wearable tech like neural implants or smart contact lenses might integrate computing directly into our senses, making handheld devices as quaint as pocket watches. The separation of phone, camera, wallet, and GPS into one gadget was revolutionary, but its limitations in processing power and interface would highlight how far we've come.

These predictions aren't set in stone; technology's path is unpredictable, influenced by ethics, economics, and unforeseen breakthroughs. Yet, reflecting on them reminds us that progress often renders the familiar absurd. What seems indispensable today might tomorrow be a punchline in a museum exhibit, urging us to embrace change while appreciating the ingenuity that got us here. As we hurtle toward the future, these technologies serve as bridges, soon to be crossed and left behind. (Word count: 1,128)

Read the Full The Daily Dot Article at:
[ https://www.dailydot.com/culture/current-technology-ridiculous-in-50-years/ ]

N※N

14 current technologies people hope will seem ridiculous in 50 years

Technologies of Today That Will Seem Utterly Ridiculous in 50 Years