Science & Technology
Fri, August 15, 2025
[ Today @ 02:48 AM ]: KELO Sioux Falls
[ Today @ 02:47 AM ]: The Cool Down
[ Today @ 02:46 AM ]: Business Today
[ Today @ 12:48 AM ]: The New York Times
[ Today @ 12:47 AM ]: Sun Sentinel
Thu, August 14, 2025
[ Yesterday Evening ]: Space.com
[ Yesterday Evening ]: The Straits Times
[ Yesterday Evening ]: WFXT
[ Yesterday Evening ]: WCIA Champaign
[ Yesterday Evening ]: The Hill
[ Yesterday Evening ]: Honolulu Star-Advertiser
[ Yesterday Evening ]: Serious Eats
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: SlashGear
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: legit
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Forbes
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Euronews
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Jerry
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: yahoo.com
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: The Raw Story
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: The Independent US
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: ThePrint
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Pacific Daily News
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: The Center Square
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Interesting Engineering
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Perth Now
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: SB Nation
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Reason.com
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Popular Science
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Phys.org
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: TheNewsCenter
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: BBC
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: The Independent US
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Crash
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Popular Mechanics
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Cool Down
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Atlantic
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Motley Fool
[ Yesterday Morning ]: BGR
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Medscape
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Cool Down
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Fox News
[ Yesterday Morning ]: National Geographic news
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The New York Times
[ Yesterday Morning ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Forbes
[ Yesterday Morning ]: National Geographic news
[ Yesterday Morning ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: LancasterOnline
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Built By Girls
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Seeking Alpha
Wed, August 13, 2025
[ Last Wednesday ]: KHON Honolulu
[ Last Wednesday ]: WGHP Greensboro
[ Last Wednesday ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Last Wednesday ]: galvnews.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Hill
[ Last Wednesday ]: KSNF Joplin
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Advocate
[ Last Wednesday ]: WSB Cox articles
[ Last Wednesday ]: AtoZ Sports
[ Last Wednesday ]: KBTX
[ Last Wednesday ]: Toronto Star
[ Last Wednesday ]: Billboard
[ Last Wednesday ]: PhoneArena
[ Last Wednesday ]: WSMV
[ Last Wednesday ]: BBC
[ Last Wednesday ]: gizmodo.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Last Wednesday ]: HELLO BEAUTIFUL
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Wednesday ]: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
[ Last Wednesday ]: Business Insider
[ Last Wednesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Wednesday ]: Associated Press Finance
[ Last Wednesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Wednesday ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: Impacts
[ Last Wednesday ]: Wyoming News
[ Last Wednesday ]: dpa international
[ Last Wednesday ]: Mental Floss
[ Last Wednesday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Wednesday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Boston Globe
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Daily News Online
[ Last Wednesday ]: WOFL
[ Last Wednesday ]: BBC
[ Last Wednesday ]: ScienceAlert
[ Last Wednesday ]: KHON Honolulu
Tue, August 12, 2025
[ Last Tuesday ]: breitbart.com
[ Last Tuesday ]: USA TODAY
[ Last Tuesday ]: Valley News Live
[ Last Tuesday ]: Defense News
[ Last Tuesday ]: KCCI Des Moines
[ Last Tuesday ]: WAVE3
[ Last Tuesday ]: Men's Fitness
[ Last Tuesday ]: Slate
[ Last Tuesday ]: Penn Live
[ Last Tuesday ]: 14 NEWS
[ Last Tuesday ]: SB Nation
[ Last Tuesday ]: WGN Chicago
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Straits Times
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Tuesday ]: WPTV-TV
[ Last Tuesday ]: yahoo.com
[ Last Tuesday ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Last Tuesday ]: WKBN 27 First News
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Scotsman
[ Last Tuesday ]: Reuters
[ Last Tuesday ]: The News-Gazette
[ Last Tuesday ]: STAT
[ Last Tuesday ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Last Tuesday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Tuesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Tuesday ]: HuffPost
[ Last Tuesday ]: Time
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Oklahoman
[ Last Tuesday ]: Food & Wine
[ Last Tuesday ]: Lowyat.net
Mon, August 11, 2025
[ Last Monday ]: Futurism
[ Last Monday ]: Tasting Table
[ Last Monday ]: USA TODAY
[ Last Monday ]: WAFF
[ Last Monday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Monday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Monday ]: TechCrunch
[ Last Monday ]: WSMV
[ Last Monday ]: Tampa Free Press
[ Last Monday ]: WHIO
[ Last Monday ]: Business Insider
[ Last Monday ]: New Hampshire Union Leader
[ Last Monday ]: ABC Kcrg 9
[ Last Monday ]: breitbart.com
[ Last Monday ]: The Financial Express
[ Last Monday ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Last Monday ]: SB Nation
[ Last Monday ]: reuters.com
[ Last Monday ]: SB Nation
[ Last Monday ]: ESPN
[ Last Monday ]: Chattanooga Times Free Press
[ Last Monday ]: BBC
[ Last Monday ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Last Monday ]: Reuters
[ Last Monday ]: Live Science
[ Last Monday ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Last Monday ]: Impacts
[ Last Monday ]: The West Australian
Sun, August 10, 2025
[ Last Sunday ]: Fox News
[ Last Sunday ]: The Cool Down
[ Last Sunday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Sunday ]: Real Simple
[ Last Sunday ]: Vogue
[ Last Sunday ]: The Conversation
[ Last Sunday ]: The Takeout
[ Last Sunday ]: earth
[ Last Sunday ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Last Sunday ]: Seattle Times
[ Last Sunday ]: Press-Republican, Plattsburgh, N.Y.
[ Last Sunday ]: Las Vegas Review-Journal
[ Last Sunday ]: LA Times
[ Last Sunday ]: indulgexpress
[ Last Sunday ]: The Motley Fool
Sat, August 9, 2025
[ Last Saturday ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Last Saturday ]: Killeen Daily Herald
[ Last Saturday ]: ThePrint
[ Last Saturday ]: TV Technology
[ Last Saturday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Saturday ]: WTAE-TV
[ Last Saturday ]: WSAV Savannah
[ Last Saturday ]: The West Australian
[ Last Saturday ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Last Saturday ]: Chowhound
[ Last Saturday ]: Local 12 WKRC Cincinnati
[ Last Saturday ]: uDiscover
[ Last Saturday ]: WRBL Columbus
[ Last Saturday ]: Telangana Today
[ Last Saturday ]: Forbes
[ Last Saturday ]: The Cool Down
[ Last Saturday ]: The Straits Times
[ Last Saturday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Saturday ]: BBC
How States Could Throw University Science a Lifeline
//science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. s-could-throw-university-science-a-lifeline.html
Published in Science and Technology on Thursday, August 14th 2025 at 9:52 GMT by The Atlantic🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
There's a way to respond to Trump's brutal and reckless funding cutbacks and it doesn't need Washington's permission.
States Could Throw University Science Programs Into Chaos
In recent years, a wave of legislation across various U.S. states has targeted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in higher education, raising alarms among academics and researchers about the potential fallout on university science programs. These laws, often framed as efforts to eliminate perceived ideological biases or "woke" policies, could inadvertently—or perhaps intentionally—disrupt the foundational operations of scientific research and education at public universities. From hiring practices to grant funding and curriculum development, the ripple effects might extend far beyond the intended scope, potentially stifling innovation, diversity in STEM fields, and even the recruitment of top talent.
At the heart of this issue are bills passed in states like Texas, Florida, and Utah, which prohibit public universities from maintaining DEI offices, requiring diversity statements in hiring, or incorporating certain topics related to race, gender, and systemic inequality into academic programs. Proponents argue that such measures promote merit-based decisions and prevent discrimination against conservative viewpoints. Critics, however, including many scientists and university administrators, warn that these restrictions could throw science departments into disarray by limiting their ability to address long-standing disparities in fields like physics, biology, and engineering, where underrepresented groups—such as women, Black and Hispanic researchers, and LGBTQ+ individuals—have historically faced barriers.
Consider the hiring process, a critical component of building robust science programs. Many universities have adopted DEI statements as part of job applications to ensure candidates are committed to fostering inclusive environments. These statements help departments evaluate how applicants might contribute to mentoring diverse students or addressing biases in research. But under new laws, such requirements are being outlawed. In Texas, for instance, Senate Bill 17, which took effect in January 2024, bans DEI offices and prohibits the use of diversity considerations in hiring. This has led to immediate changes: the University of Texas system has dismantled its DEI infrastructure, affecting how science faculties recruit. Professors report that without these tools, they risk overlooking qualified candidates from marginalized backgrounds, which could exacerbate the already low representation in STEM. Data from the National Science Foundation shows that only about 10% of full-time faculty in physical sciences are from underrepresented minorities, a figure that DEI efforts were slowly improving.
Beyond hiring, these laws could impact research funding and collaborations. Federal grants from agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) often prioritize projects that promote diversity and inclusion. For example, the NSF's ADVANCE program explicitly funds initiatives to increase gender equity in STEM. If state laws restrict universities from pursuing such goals, institutions might become ineligible for millions in federal dollars. This isn't hypothetical; in Florida, under Governor Ron DeSantis's anti-DEI push, universities like the University of Florida have faced scrutiny over courses and programs that touch on social justice themes, even in scientific contexts. A biology department, for instance, might hesitate to offer a course on environmental justice—examining how pollution disproportionately affects low-income communities of color—fearing it could be labeled as promoting "divisive concepts."
The chaos extends to student experiences and outcomes. Science education thrives on diverse perspectives, which drive innovation. Studies, including those published in journals like Nature, demonstrate that diverse research teams produce more creative and impactful work. By curtailing DEI, states risk creating homogenous environments that deter talented students from underrepresented groups. Imagine a promising Black student in computer science who chooses a university in a state without these restrictions, like California, over one in Texas, simply because they feel more supported. This brain drain could weaken STEM programs in affected states, making them less competitive nationally and internationally.
Administrators are scrambling to adapt. At the University of Utah, following a similar anti-DEI bill, science departments are rephrasing job postings to emphasize "inclusive excellence" without explicitly mentioning DEI, walking a fine line to comply with the law while maintaining their values. Yet, this semantic maneuvering often leads to confusion and inefficiency. Faculty members express frustration, with some considering relocation. A survey by the American Association of University Professors found that over 20% of faculty in states with such laws are contemplating leaving, a trend that could decimate science departments already struggling with shortages in fields like artificial intelligence and climate science.
Moreover, these policies intersect with broader cultural wars, amplifying their impact on science. In states like Oklahoma and Alabama, proposed bills go further, potentially censoring discussions of topics like climate change or evolution if they're deemed politically charged. While not directly tied to DEI, the anti-DEI momentum fuels a chilling effect on academic freedom. Scientists worry that research on topics like health disparities—say, why certain diseases affect racial minorities more severely—could be stifled if it's seen as advancing a "divisive" agenda.
The long-term consequences are profound. Universities are engines of economic growth, with science programs generating patents, startups, and jobs. Disrupting them could hinder state economies. Texas, home to world-class institutions like Rice University and UT Austin, risks losing its edge in biotechnology and energy research. Florida's ambitions in space exploration and marine science could falter if talent flees to more welcoming environments.
Advocates for DEI counter that these programs are not about quotas but about leveling the playing field. They point to success stories, like increased female participation in engineering following targeted outreach. Without such efforts, the U.S. might fall behind global competitors like China and Europe, where diversity in science is increasingly emphasized.
In response, some universities are seeking workarounds, such as partnering with private foundations or alumni networks to fund DEI-like initiatives indirectly. Legal challenges are mounting too; the ACLU and other groups have filed suits arguing that these laws violate free speech and equal protection rights. Yet, with more states— including Kansas and Indiana—considering similar legislation, the uncertainty persists.
Ultimately, while the intent may be to refocus education on "core" subjects, these laws could undermine the very essence of scientific inquiry: curiosity, collaboration, and inclusivity. As one professor put it, "Science isn't done in a vacuum; it's shaped by the people who do it." If states continue down this path, they might not just throw university science into chaos—they could stall America's scientific progress for generations. (Word count: 928)
Read the Full The Atlantic Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/states-could-throw-university-science-113000949.html ]