On Technology: Dave Taylor: AI can help teachers craft quizzes

Published in Science and Technology on Sunday, August 17th 2025 at 17:04 GMT by Daily Camera
^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Q: I teach history at a public middle school. How can I use AI to help me create quizzes and worksheets students? I currently compose them by hand, but it's quite time intensive so I end up reusing

On Technology: Dave Taylor: AI Can Help Teachers Craft Quizzes

In the ever-evolving landscape of education, artificial intelligence is emerging as a powerful ally for teachers, particularly when it comes to the time-consuming task of creating quizzes and assessments. Dave Taylor, a seasoned technology expert and columnist, delves into this topic in his latest piece, highlighting how AI tools can streamline the process of quiz development, making it faster, more efficient, and potentially more effective. Taylor argues that while AI isn't a replacement for human educators, it serves as a valuable assistant that can handle the grunt work, allowing teachers to focus on what they do best: inspiring and guiding students.

Taylor begins by painting a relatable picture of the challenges teachers face. Imagine a high school history teacher preparing a quiz on the American Revolution. Traditionally, this involves hours of brainstorming questions, ensuring they cover key concepts, varying difficulty levels, and aligning with learning objectives. It's a laborious process, often squeezed into already packed schedules. Enter AI, which Taylor describes as a "digital sidekick" capable of generating quiz questions almost instantaneously. Tools like ChatGPT, Google Bard, or specialized education platforms such as Quizlet AI or Khan Academy's integrations can take a simple prompt—say, "Create 10 multiple-choice questions on the causes of the American Revolution for 10th-grade students"—and produce a set of questions complete with answer choices and explanations.

One of the key advantages Taylor emphasizes is customization. AI can tailor quizzes to specific needs, such as adapting to different grade levels, incorporating diverse question types (multiple-choice, true/false, short answer, or even essay prompts), and ensuring inclusivity by generating content that considers cultural sensitivities or varying student abilities. For instance, Taylor shares an anecdote about a teacher who used AI to create differentiated quizzes for a mixed-ability classroom. The AI generated easier questions for struggling students and more challenging ones for advanced learners, all based on a single input. This personalization, Taylor notes, promotes equity in education, helping to bridge gaps that might otherwise widen due to resource constraints.

Beyond generation, AI excels in refinement and iteration. Taylor explains how teachers can refine AI outputs by providing feedback loops. If the initial questions are too vague or off-topic, a follow-up prompt like "Make these questions more focused on primary sources" can yield improved results. This iterative process mirrors the way teachers naturally revise their materials but accelerates it dramatically. Moreover, AI can incorporate multimedia elements, suggesting images, videos, or interactive components to make quizzes more engaging. Taylor points out that in an era where student attention spans are challenged by digital distractions, such enhancements can boost participation and retention.

Taylor doesn't shy away from the potential pitfalls, offering a balanced view. He warns that AI-generated content isn't infallible; it can sometimes produce inaccurate information, biased perspectives, or overly simplistic questions that fail to probe deeper understanding. For example, an AI might confuse historical facts or generate questions with subtle errors that only a subject expert would catch. To mitigate this, Taylor advises teachers to always review and edit AI outputs, treating them as drafts rather than final products. He also touches on ethical concerns, such as the risk of over-reliance on AI, which could diminish teachers' own skills in curriculum design, or issues of academic integrity if students use similar tools to cheat on quizzes. Taylor stresses the importance of transparency—educators should disclose when AI is used and teach students about its limitations to foster critical thinking.

Looking ahead, Taylor explores the broader implications for education. He envisions AI not just as a quiz-maker but as a comprehensive teaching aid that could analyze student performance data from quizzes to suggest personalized lesson plans or identify knowledge gaps. Platforms like Duolingo or adaptive learning systems already do this on a small scale, but Taylor predicts widespread adoption in K-12 and higher education. He cites studies from organizations like the Brookings Institution, which suggest that AI could reduce teacher workload by up to 20-30%, freeing time for mentorship and creative instruction. However, he cautions against viewing AI as a panacea, especially in underfunded schools where access to technology remains uneven.

In a practical demonstration, Taylor walks readers through a step-by-step example using a free AI tool. Starting with a prompt for a science quiz on photosynthesis, the AI generates questions like: "Which gas is released as a byproduct of photosynthesis? A) Oxygen B) Carbon Dioxide C) Nitrogen D) Hydrogen." It even provides rationales for correct and incorrect answers, aiding in grading. Taylor then shows how to enhance it by adding open-ended questions or tying it to real-world applications, such as climate change. This hands-on approach makes the article accessible, encouraging even tech-averse teachers to experiment.

Taylor concludes with an optimistic yet grounded message: AI is transforming education from a one-size-fits-all model to a more dynamic, student-centered experience. By helping craft quizzes, it empowers teachers to assess learning more effectively and adapt to individual needs. Yet, the human element remains irreplaceable—AI can generate questions, but it's the teacher who ignites curiosity and fosters growth. As Taylor puts it, "AI is like a sharp pencil in a teacher's toolkit; it doesn't write the story, but it sure makes drafting easier." For educators navigating the digital age, embracing AI could be the key to not just surviving, but thriving in the classroom.

This exploration underscores a pivotal shift in how technology intersects with pedagogy, promising to make teaching more efficient while preserving the artistry of education. Taylor's insights serve as a call to action for teachers to explore these tools, experiment responsibly, and ultimately enhance the learning journey for their students. (Word count: 842)

Read the Full Daily Camera Article at:
[ https://www.dailycamera.com/2025/08/17/on-technology-dave-taylor-ai-can-help-teachers-craft-quizzes/ ]