Science & Technology
Mon, July 28, 2025
[ Yesterday Evening ]: MinnPost
[ Yesterday Evening ]: Phys.org
[ Yesterday Evening ]: WSB Cox articles
[ Yesterday Evening ]: WJTV Jackson
[ Yesterday Evening ]: abc13
[ Yesterday Evening ]: KRQE Albuquerque
[ Yesterday Evening ]: The Motley Fool
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: The Motley Fool
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: WSAZ
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: BGR
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: WTVO Rockford
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Jerusalem Post
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: ScienceAlert
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Fox News
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Forbes
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: CBS News
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Associated Press
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: The Jerusalem Post Blogs
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Cleveland.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: CBS News
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Associated Press
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Globe and Mail
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Organic Authority
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Wrestle Zone
[ Yesterday Morning ]: gizmodo.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Fadeaway World
[ Yesterday Morning ]: CBS News
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Weather Channel
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The New York Times
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Jerusalem Post Blogs
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Phys.org
[ Yesterday Morning ]: yahoo.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Cool Down
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Forbes
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Motley Fool
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Forbes
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Chicago Tribune
[ Yesterday Morning ]: KCBD
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Impacts
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Organic Authority
[ Yesterday Morning ]: World Socialist Web Site
[ Yesterday Morning ]: IBTimes UK
Sun, July 27, 2025
[ Last Sunday ]: The New Indian Express
[ Last Sunday ]: The New Indian Express
[ Last Sunday ]: Local 12 WKRC Cincinnati
[ Last Sunday ]: Good Housekeeping
[ Last Sunday ]: GovCon Wire
[ Last Sunday ]: The Jerusalem Post Blogs
[ Last Sunday ]: Forbes
[ Last Sunday ]: The Financial Express
Sat, July 26, 2025
[ Last Saturday ]: Reuters
[ Last Saturday ]: The News International
[ Last Saturday ]: Forbes
[ Last Saturday ]: KTVU
[ Last Saturday ]: Forbes
[ Last Saturday ]: Futurism
[ Last Saturday ]: lbbonline
[ Last Saturday ]: Phys.org
[ Last Saturday ]: NJ.com
[ Last Saturday ]: The Cool Down
[ Last Saturday ]: HuffPost Life
[ Last Saturday ]: The Jerusalem Post Blogs
[ Last Saturday ]: Live Science
[ Last Saturday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Saturday ]: thedispatch.com
[ Last Saturday ]: Salon
[ Last Saturday ]: WTVO Rockford
[ Last Saturday ]: yahoo.com
[ Last Saturday ]: ZDNet
[ Last Saturday ]: Impacts
[ Last Saturday ]: BBC
[ Last Saturday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Saturday ]: The Globe and Mail
[ Last Saturday ]: London Evening Standard
[ Last Saturday ]: Live Science
[ Last Saturday ]: The New Indian Express
Fri, July 25, 2025
[ Last Friday ]: NBC Washington
[ Last Friday ]: 13abc
[ Last Friday ]: CBS News
[ Last Friday ]: The Observer, La Grande, Ore.
[ Last Friday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Friday ]: reuters.com
[ Last Friday ]: Upper
[ Last Friday ]: Investopedia
[ Last Friday ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Last Friday ]: Associated Press
[ Last Friday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Friday ]: Cleveland.com
[ Last Friday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Friday ]: The Cool Down
[ Last Friday ]: The Cool Down
[ Last Friday ]: Fox News
[ Last Friday ]: Space.com
[ Last Friday ]: Forbes
[ Last Friday ]: Forbes
[ Last Friday ]: Fortune
[ Last Friday ]: The Boston Globe
[ Last Friday ]: Leader-Telegram, Eau Claire, Wis.
[ Last Friday ]: Madrid Universal
[ Last Friday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Friday ]: Impacts
[ Last Friday ]: Impacts
[ Last Friday ]: Daily Record
Thu, July 24, 2025
[ Last Thursday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Thursday ]: WABI-TV
[ Last Thursday ]: WAFF
[ Last Thursday ]: HELLO! Magazine
[ Last Thursday ]: St. Louis Post-Dispatch
[ Last Thursday ]: thetimes.com
[ Last Thursday ]: Impacts
[ Last Thursday ]: The Hill
[ Last Thursday ]: Action News Jax
[ Last Thursday ]: Fox News
[ Last Thursday ]: NBC 6 South Florida
[ Last Thursday ]: Live Science
[ Last Thursday ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Last Thursday ]: Defense News
[ Last Thursday ]: CNET
[ Last Thursday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Thursday ]: CNET
[ Last Thursday ]: yahoo.com
[ Last Thursday ]: London Evening Standard
[ Last Thursday ]: The 74
[ Last Thursday ]: Ukrayinska Pravda
[ Last Thursday ]: Rhode Island Current
[ Last Thursday ]: The Decatur Daily, Ala.
[ Last Thursday ]: Foreign Policy
[ Last Thursday ]: Florida Today
[ Last Thursday ]: Forbes
[ Last Thursday ]: MassLive
[ Last Thursday ]: Business Today
[ Last Thursday ]: The Cool Down
[ Last Thursday ]: WFXT
[ Last Thursday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Thursday ]: Associated Press Finance
[ Last Thursday ]: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
[ Last Thursday ]: The Straits Times
[ Last Thursday ]: The Sun
[ Last Thursday ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Last Thursday ]: Forbes
[ Last Thursday ]: BBC
[ Last Thursday ]: WFTV
[ Last Thursday ]: TechCrunch
[ Last Thursday ]: The Michigan Daily
[ Last Thursday ]: Fox News
[ Last Thursday ]: moneycontrol.com
Wed, July 23, 2025
[ Last Wednesday ]: People
[ Last Wednesday ]: Today
[ Last Wednesday ]: ABC News
[ Last Wednesday ]: WESH
[ Last Wednesday ]: ABC
[ Last Wednesday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Wednesday ]: Politico
[ Last Wednesday ]: yahoo.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: Atlanta Journal-Constitution
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Wednesday ]: reuters.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: Telangana Today
[ Last Wednesday ]: Fox News
[ Last Wednesday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Wednesday ]: Medscape
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Scotsman
[ Last Wednesday ]: Deseret News
[ Last Wednesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Wednesday ]: KWCH
[ Last Wednesday ]: ThePrint
[ Last Wednesday ]: New Jersey Monitor
[ Last Wednesday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Wednesday ]: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
[ Last Wednesday ]: Daily Express
[ Last Wednesday ]: Telangana Today
Tue, July 22, 2025
[ Last Tuesday ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Last Tuesday ]: CNBC
[ Last Tuesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Hill
[ Last Tuesday ]: KBTX
[ Last Tuesday ]: Detroit News
[ Last Tuesday ]: Fox News
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Independent
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Hill
[ Last Tuesday ]: NBC DFW
[ Last Tuesday ]: Phys.org
[ Last Tuesday ]: Post-Bulletin, Rochester, Minn.
[ Last Tuesday ]: STAT
[ Last Tuesday ]: Associated Press
[ Last Tuesday ]: Newsweek
[ Last Tuesday ]: Space.com
[ Last Tuesday ]: Channel 3000
[ Last Tuesday ]: Tacoma News Tribune
These 4 Distinct Patterns May Signal Alzheimer's According to Science
//science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. may-signal-alzheimer-s-according-to-science.html
Published in Science and Technology on Monday, July 28th 2025 at 16:03 GMT by ScienceAlert🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
A new hope for early diagnosis.
4 Distinct Patterns That May Signal the End of a Relationship
In the complex world of romantic partnerships, certain behaviors can act as red flags, indicating that a relationship might be heading toward an inevitable breakdown. Drawing from decades of psychological research, experts have identified four specific patterns of interaction that often predict the demise of a marriage or long-term commitment. These patterns, famously dubbed the "Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse" by renowned relationship researcher Dr. John Gottman, emerge from his extensive studies at the Gottman Institute. Based on observations of thousands of couples, Gottman's work reveals that when these behaviors become habitual, they erode the foundation of trust, respect, and emotional connection, making divorce or separation highly likely—up to 90% predictability in some cases. Understanding these patterns isn't just about spotting trouble; it's about recognizing opportunities for intervention and repair. In this article, we'll delve deeply into each of these four destructive patterns, exploring their manifestations, underlying causes, real-world examples, and strategies for countering them to potentially salvage a faltering relationship.
The first pattern, criticism, goes beyond mere complaints and ventures into personal attacks that target a partner's character or personality. Unlike a healthy expression of dissatisfaction—such as saying, "I feel overwhelmed when the dishes pile up"—criticism frames the issue as a fundamental flaw in the other person. Phrases like "You're always so lazy and inconsiderate" or "You never think about anyone but yourself" exemplify this. According to Gottman, criticism often stems from unresolved frustrations that build over time, leading to a cycle where one partner feels constantly judged and inadequate. This behavior is particularly insidious because it invites defensiveness and escalates conflicts rather than resolving them. In long-term studies, couples who frequently engage in criticism show higher levels of resentment, which can fester and poison the relationship's emotional intimacy.
To illustrate, consider a couple where one partner is perpetually late. A critical response might be, "You're so irresponsible; you can't even manage your time like a normal adult." This not only addresses the lateness but attacks the person's core identity, making them feel belittled. Over time, such interactions chip away at self-esteem and mutual respect. Research from the Gottman Institute suggests that criticism is more common in relationships where partners have mismatched communication styles or unaddressed emotional needs. The antidote? Experts recommend shifting to "I" statements that focus on personal feelings rather than blame. For instance, "I feel anxious when we're late because it stresses me out" opens the door to empathy and problem-solving. Couples therapy often emphasizes practicing this skill through role-playing exercises, helping partners reframe their language to foster understanding instead of division.
Moving to the second pattern, contempt is considered the most toxic of the four, as it conveys disgust and superiority toward one's partner. This can manifest through sarcasm, mockery, eye-rolling, or hostile humor—behaviors that signal a deep-seated lack of respect. Gottman describes contempt as "sulfuric acid for love," noting that it often arises from prolonged negativity and unresolved conflicts, leading to a sense of moral superiority. In observational studies, couples displaying contempt during arguments were far more likely to separate, with physiological markers like elevated heart rates indicating heightened stress and emotional disconnection.
A classic example is when one partner belittles the other's interests or achievements, such as sneering, "Oh, great, another one of your brilliant ideas that will probably fail like all the others." This not only humiliates but also erodes the bond, making reconciliation difficult. Contempt is frequently linked to broader issues like power imbalances or external stressors, such as financial strain or family interference. To combat it, building a culture of appreciation is key. Gottman advises a ratio of five positive interactions for every negative one, such as expressing gratitude daily—"I really appreciate how you handled that situation with the kids." Mindfulness practices and therapy can help partners recognize contemptuous impulses and replace them with affirmations, gradually rebuilding admiration and fondness.
The third pattern, defensiveness, acts as a shield against perceived attacks but ultimately perpetuates conflict by avoiding accountability. When criticized or confronted, a defensive person might counter with excuses, denial, or even turning the blame back on their partner. Common responses include "It's not my fault; you're the one who's always nagging" or "Why are you making such a big deal out of nothing?" This pattern, Gottman explains, stems from a fear of vulnerability and often masks deeper insecurities. In his research, defensiveness correlates with stalled communication, as it prevents genuine dialogue and problem resolution, leading to a buildup of unresolved issues.
Imagine a scenario where one partner forgets an important anniversary. A defensive reaction could be, "Well, if you weren't so busy with work all the time, maybe I'd remember." This shifts responsibility and invalidates the other's feelings, escalating the argument. Studies show that defensiveness is more prevalent in high-stress environments or among individuals with attachment issues from childhood. Breaking this cycle involves taking responsibility and validating the partner's perspective. Techniques like active listening—repeating back what you've heard to ensure understanding—can de-escalate tensions. Couples are encouraged to pause during heated moments, perhaps using a "time-out" signal, to reflect and respond more thoughtfully, fostering a safer space for honesty.
Finally, stonewalling represents emotional withdrawal, where one partner shuts down and disengages, often to self-soothe amid overwhelming conflict. This can look like tuning out, giving the silent treatment, or physically leaving the room. Gottman notes that stonewalling typically follows the other horsemen, serving as a last-resort coping mechanism when criticism, contempt, and defensiveness have flooded the interaction. Physiologically, it involves a state of emotional overload, with heart rates soaring above 100 beats per minute, making rational discussion impossible. In predictive models, stonewalling is a strong indicator of impending relational collapse, as it leaves the other partner feeling abandoned and unheard.
For instance, during an argument about finances, a stonewalling partner might stare blankly at their phone, offering monosyllabic responses or none at all. This behavior, while protective in the moment, erodes intimacy over time, leading to isolation. It's often more common in men, per Gottman's findings, due to socialization differences, but it affects all genders. To address it, self-soothing techniques like deep breathing or short breaks are recommended, followed by re-engagement. Partners can establish ground rules for conflicts, such as agreeing to revisit discussions after cooling down, ensuring both feel supported.
In conclusion, these four patterns—criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling—serve as warning signs that a relationship may be on shaky ground. However, they're not inevitable sentences; awareness and proactive steps can turn the tide. Gottman's research emphasizes the importance of repair attempts, like humor or affection during arguments, to mitigate damage. Seeking professional help, such as through couples counseling, can provide tailored tools to replace these destructive habits with healthier ones. Ultimately, relationships thrive on mutual effort, empathy, and continuous growth. By recognizing these patterns early, couples can choose to rewrite their story, transforming potential endings into new beginnings. Whether you're in a budding romance or a decades-long marriage, paying attention to how you communicate could be the key to lasting love. (Word count: 1,048)
Read the Full ScienceAlert Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/4-distinct-patterns-may-signal-190029573.html ]