The science of leadership is built around these nine capacities

Published in Science and Technology on Monday, July 28th 2025 at 11:28 GMT by The Globe and Mail
^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

The authors of The Science of Leadership observe that what makes being a leader challenging is leadership capacities operate simultaneously at three levels: Leading yourself, leading others and leading a system, such as a team or an organization

The Science of Leadership: Unpacking the Nine Essential Capacities

In the ever-evolving landscape of modern business and organizational management, effective leadership has transcended mere intuition or charisma, evolving into a discipline grounded in empirical research and psychological insights. Drawing from extensive studies in behavioral science, neuroscience, and organizational psychology, leadership can be distilled into nine core capacities that distinguish exceptional leaders from the rest. These capacities are not innate traits but skills that can be cultivated through deliberate practice, self-reflection, and experiential learning. They form the foundation of what is often referred to as "intelligent leadership," a framework that emphasizes adaptability, emotional acuity, and strategic foresight in guiding teams and organizations toward sustained success. This approach challenges traditional notions of leadership as a hierarchical power dynamic, instead positioning it as a multifaceted capability that fosters innovation, resilience, and collective growth.

The first capacity is thinking differently and thinking big. Leaders who excel in this area possess the ability to break free from conventional wisdom and envision bold, transformative futures. This involves challenging the status quo, embracing diverse perspectives, and fostering a culture of innovation within their teams. Research from cognitive psychology highlights how such thinking activates neural pathways associated with creativity and problem-solving. For instance, leaders might encourage brainstorming sessions that integrate ideas from unrelated fields, leading to breakthrough solutions in industries like technology or healthcare. Without this capacity, organizations risk stagnation, as seen in companies that failed to anticipate digital disruptions. Developing this skill requires exposure to varied experiences, such as cross-industry collaborations or mentorship programs that push boundaries.

Closely related is the second capacity: acting with courage. Courage in leadership is not about reckless bravado but calculated risk-taking and standing firm in the face of adversity. Neuroscientific studies show that courageous actions correlate with lower activity in the amygdala, the brain's fear center, allowing leaders to make decisions under pressure. This capacity manifests in scenarios like advocating for ethical practices during corporate scandals or pivoting business strategies amid economic downturns. Leaders build courage through incremental challenges, such as public speaking or leading high-stakes projects, which gradually desensitize them to fear. Organizations benefit immensely from courageous leaders, as they inspire trust and motivate teams to embrace change rather than shy away from it.

The third capacity, emotional intelligence, serves as the emotional backbone of effective leadership. Coined by psychologists like Daniel Goleman, this involves self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills. Leaders with high emotional intelligence can read the room, manage their own emotions during crises, and connect with team members on a human level. Empirical data from workplace studies indicate that teams led by emotionally intelligent individuals exhibit higher engagement and lower turnover rates. For example, during remote work transitions prompted by global events, such leaders maintained morale by actively listening to employee concerns and adapting policies accordingly. Cultivating this capacity often involves feedback mechanisms like 360-degree reviews and mindfulness practices that enhance emotional regulation.

Authenticity emerges as the fourth capacity, emphasizing genuineness and integrity in leadership. Authentic leaders align their actions with their core values, fostering transparency and trust. Research in positive psychology links authenticity to higher job satisfaction and organizational commitment among followers. This capacity counters the pitfalls of performative leadership, where facades lead to disillusionment. Leaders might demonstrate authenticity by openly sharing vulnerabilities, such as admitting past failures, which humanizes them and encourages a culture of openness. Building authenticity requires introspection, perhaps through journaling or coaching, to ensure personal values guide decision-making.

Self-awareness, the fifth capacity, is the introspective mirror that allows leaders to understand their strengths, weaknesses, biases, and impact on others. Studies from organizational behavior reveal that self-aware leaders are more effective in diverse teams, as they mitigate blind spots that could lead to poor judgments. Tools like personality assessments (e.g., Myers-Briggs or emotional intelligence quizzes) aid in developing this capacity. A self-aware leader might recognize their tendency toward micromanagement and delegate more effectively, leading to empowered teams. Without self-awareness, leaders risk repeating mistakes, as evidenced by high-profile executive failures attributed to unchecked egos.

Decisiveness, the sixth capacity, is the ability to make timely, informed decisions even in ambiguity. Decision science research underscores that decisive leaders weigh options quickly, drawing on data and intuition, which propels organizational momentum. This is crucial in fast-paced environments like startups, where hesitation can mean missed opportunities. Leaders hone decisiveness through scenario planning and post-decision reviews, learning from both successes and failures. For instance, during market volatility, a decisive leader might swiftly reallocate resources to emerging trends, outpacing competitors.

Accountability forms the seventh capacity, where leaders take ownership of outcomes and hold themselves and others to high standards. This capacity is rooted in ethical leadership models, promoting a culture of responsibility that enhances performance. Psychological studies show that accountable leaders model behavior that reduces blame-shifting and increases productivity. Implementing accountability might involve setting clear goals with measurable KPIs and conducting regular progress check-ins. In practice, this could mean a CEO publicly acknowledging a product launch delay and outlining corrective steps, thereby rebuilding stakeholder confidence.

The eighth capacity, focus, enables leaders to prioritize amid distractions, channeling energy toward strategic objectives. In an era of information overload, focus is linked to executive function in the brain, as per neuroscience findings. Focused leaders avoid multitasking pitfalls, instead employing techniques like time-blocking or delegation to maintain clarity. This capacity drives efficiency, as seen in leaders who steer companies through restructurings by concentrating on core competencies. Developing focus often involves mindfulness training or digital detoxes to sharpen attention spans.

Finally, the ninth capacity is systems thinking, which involves understanding the interconnectedness of organizational elements and external factors. Leaders with this capacity view challenges holistically, anticipating ripple effects and designing sustainable solutions. Systems theory, applied in management science, illustrates how this approach prevents siloed decision-making. For example, in addressing supply chain disruptions, a systems-thinking leader considers environmental, economic, and social dimensions, leading to resilient strategies. Cultivation comes from studying complex case studies and engaging in cross-functional collaborations.

These nine capacities are interdependent, forming a robust framework for leadership excellence. Leaders who integrate them create environments where innovation thrives, teams collaborate effectively, and organizations adapt to change. Scientific backing from fields like psychology and neuroscience validates that these skills can be learned, debunking the myth of the "born leader." Aspiring leaders are encouraged to assess their proficiencies in these areas, perhaps through self-audits or professional development programs, and commit to ongoing growth. In doing so, they not only elevate their own performance but also contribute to more ethical, inclusive, and successful organizations. The science of leadership, therefore, is not a static set of rules but a dynamic journey toward mastering these capacities, ensuring that leadership remains a force for positive impact in an increasingly complex world.

(Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full The Globe and Mail Article at:
[ https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/careers/management/article-the-science-of-leadership-is-built-around-these-nine-capacities/ ]