Mon, February 3, 2025
Sun, February 2, 2025
Sat, February 1, 2025
Fri, January 31, 2025
Thu, January 30, 2025
[ Thu, Jan 30th ] - Politico
RFK Jr.'s health tech fix
Wed, January 29, 2025
Tue, January 28, 2025
Mon, January 27, 2025
Sun, January 26, 2025
[ Sun, Jan 26th ] - Newsday
Technology news
Sat, January 25, 2025
Fri, January 24, 2025

DeepSeek vs ChatGPT - how do they compare?


//science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. /28/deepseek-vs-chatgpt-how-do-they-compare.html
Published in Science and Technology on Tuesday, January 28th 2025 at 17:02 GMT by MSN   Print publication without navigation

  • From gathering and summarising information in a helpful format to even writing blog posts on a topic, ChatGPT has become an AI companion for many across different workplaces. As a

The article from MSN discusses the comparison between DeepSeek, a new AI model developed by a Chinese tech company, and ChatGPT, the well-known AI chatbot by OpenAI. DeepSeek, which has been trained on a massive dataset including 2 trillion tokens, aims to rival ChatGPT by offering capabilities in understanding and generating human-like text. It has shown promising results in various benchmarks, particularly in understanding complex queries and providing detailed responses. However, while DeepSeek excels in certain areas like coding and math problems, ChatGPT still leads in conversational fluency, contextual understanding, and general knowledge due to its extensive training and updates. The article highlights that while DeepSeek is catching up, ChatGPT's established user base, continuous improvements, and integration into various platforms give it an edge. Additionally, the comparison touches on aspects like model size, training data, performance metrics, and potential applications, noting that both models have unique strengths but also face challenges in areas like bias, privacy, and ethical AI use.

Read the Full MSN Article at:
[ https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/techandscience/deepseek-vs-chatgpt-how-do-they-compare/ar-AA1y0wMc ]

Publication Contributing Sources