Tue, December 10, 2024
[ Tue, Dec 10th 2024 ]: unite
Victor Dey, Technology Analyst
Mon, December 9, 2024
Sun, December 8, 2024
[ Sun, Dec 08th 2024 ]: Foreign Affairs
The Best of Books 2024
Sat, December 7, 2024
Fri, December 6, 2024

The Coalition told the CSIRO to re-do its nuclear report. It's bad news for Dutton


  Copy link into your clipboard //science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. its-nuclear-report-it-s-bad-news-for-dutton.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in Science and Technology on by Sydney Morning Herald
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source


  Peter Dutton's Coalition wanted new modelling on the cost of nuclear energy. The CSIRO obliged, but the opposition leader won't like the results.

The article from The Sydney Morning Herald discusses how the Coalition, led by Peter Dutton, requested the CSIRO to revise its GenCost report, which compares the costs of different energy technologies. The CSIRO's initial findings indicated that nuclear energy would be significantly more expensive than renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Despite the Coalition's push for a re-evaluation, the updated report still showed nuclear power as the costliest option, with costs ranging from $136 to $226 per megawatt hour, compared to $73 to $128 for renewables. This outcome has been described as bad news for Dutton, who has been advocating for nuclear power as part of Australia's energy mix. The article also highlights the political motivations behind the request, suggesting that the Coalition aimed to use the report to support their nuclear policy, but the results have instead undermined their argument.

Read the Full Sydney Morning Herald Article at:
[ https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/the-coalition-told-the-csiro-to-re-do-its-nuclear-report-it-s-bad-news-for-dutton-20241205-p5kw6t.html ]

Publication Contributing Sources