


Twenty-Four Years Later, 9/11 Conspiracies Persist. The Real Science Ends the Debate.


🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source



Debunking the 9/11 Myths: A Fact‑Based Review of Popular Mechanics’ Latest Analysis
On September 11, 2001, the United States suffered the deadliest terrorist attack in its history, and the day’s events have since been the subject of a vast array of rumors, conspiracy theories, and misinformation. Popular Mechanics’ recent feature, “9/11 Myths Debunked,” tackles the most persistent and widely circulated falsehoods, drawing on the same official documents that shaped the 9/11 Commission Report and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) investigations. Below is a detailed, evidence‑driven summary of the article’s key points, enriched with additional context from the cited sources.
1. The Towers Did Not Collapse from “Explosives” or “Controlled Demolition”
The Myth. Many conspiracy theorists claim that the North and South towers of the World Trade Center (WTC) fell because the government secretly detonated explosives at the core.
The Reality. NIST’s 2008 “Final Report on the Collapse of WTC 7” and the 2003 “Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers” both explain that the structural failure was a consequence of the fires ignited by the airplanes’ impacts. The towers were designed to endure the impact of a large commercial jet; however, the combination of structural damage, heat‑induced weakening of steel, and the loss of fireproofing material caused the core columns to buckle in a series of progressive failures. The reports emphasize that there is no evidence of explosive charges, and that the pattern of debris and the timing of the collapses are consistent with a purely structural collapse.
Additional Context. Popular Mechanics notes that the NIST reports also examined the WTC 7 building, which collapsed later that day after a prolonged fire. The article stresses that the same structural failure mechanisms were at play, reinforcing the conclusion that controlled demolition was not involved.
2. The Pentagon Attack Was a Real Plane Crash, Not a Military Vehicle or “False Flag” Operation
The Myth. Some claim the Pentagon hit was a military plane, a missile, or a fake event orchestrated by the U.S. government.
The Reality. The article cites the 9/11 Commission Report, which details that American Airlines Flight 77, a commercial Boeing 757, struck the western side of the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. The crash site was left with a large crater, wreckage of the aircraft, and extensive damage to the building’s exterior walls. FAA and TSA records confirm the flight’s origin (Washington, D.C.) and destination (Los Angeles, California). The Pentagon’s own investigative team found the wreckage, and the remains of the airplane and its occupants were recovered and identified.
Additional Context. The Popular Mechanics article links to the Pentagon’s own public release and the 9/11 Commission’s findings, which confirm that the attack was carried out by the same hijackers involved in the WTC attacks, not a government operation.
3. The Airplanes Were Commercial Flights, Not Specialized “Hijack” Planes
The Myth. Another rumor suggests that the planes were custom‑built for the attacks or that they were not actual commercial aircraft.
The Reality. Flight records show that the two planes that struck the towers were United Airlines Flight 175 (Boeing 767) and American Airlines Flight 11 (Boeing 767). Flight 175 took off at 8:14 a.m., and Flight 11 at 8:46 a.m. Both were fully booked commercial flights. The article references the FAA’s flight logs and the 9/11 Commission’s timeline to demonstrate that the aircraft were standard commercial jets that carried passengers to their destinations before being hijacked.
4. WTC 7’s Collapse Was Not Due to Controlled Demolition
The Myth. Conspiracy circles often claim that the 7‑story, 7 ft‑tall WTC 7 building collapsed because of explosives placed inside the structure.
The Reality. Popular Mechanics’ analysis quotes NIST’s final report, which explains that the building sustained significant damage from debris and a fire that burned for over eight hours. The collapse occurred at 5:20 p.m. due to a single core column failure, which set off a domino effect. No evidence of explosives was found, and the debris field did not match what would be expected from a controlled demolition.
5. The Number of Hijackers and the Sequence of Events Are Fully Documented
The Myth. Some claim that there were more or fewer hijackers than the officially documented 19, or that the timeline of attacks was fabricated.
The Reality. The 9/11 Commission Report lists the 19 hijackers and corroborates their identities through biometric data, travel records, and intelligence reports. The article cross‑checks the flight times, the exact points of impact, and the sequence of aircraft hits using FAA radar data and cockpit voice recordings. The reported timeline—Flight 11 hitting the North tower at 8:46 a.m., Flight 175 striking the South tower at 9:03 a.m., Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m., and United Airlines Flight 93 crashing in Pennsylvania at 10:03 a.m.—aligns perfectly with both FAA and FBI records.
6. Survivors and Victims Were Not “Eliminated” by the Attackers
The Myth. A persistent conspiracy claim suggests that many victims were “removed” before the towers collapsed or that the towers were pre‑designed to contain the casualties.
The Reality. The article points to survivor testimonies, hospital records, and the official death toll of 2,977 victims, which is widely accepted. NIST’s reports highlight that the collapse patterns and debris distribution made survival of the tower’s interior physically impossible for most occupants, but the documented number of survivors in the lower floors is accurately recorded.
7. 9/11 Was Not a Hoax or a Government Conspiracy
The Myth. The notion that 9/11 was staged or manipulated by the U.S. government remains a cornerstone of many conspiratorial narratives.
The Reality. Popular Mechanics compiles a range of evidence: thousands of witnesses across the country, real‑time satellite imagery, video footage from the World Trade Center’s “Sally‑B” security camera, and the 9/11 Commission’s exhaustive investigation that found no credible evidence of internal complicity. The article links to the Commission’s final report and the NIST reports, underscoring the transparency and depth of the investigative process.
Final Thoughts
The Popular Mechanics article “9/11 Myths Debunked” serves as a concise, science‑based rebuttal to the most enduring falsehoods that circulate online. By drawing directly on the 9/11 Commission Report, NIST’s technical analyses, FAA flight logs, and Pentagon‑issued findings, the piece offers readers a clear, fact‑checked narrative that contrasts sharply with the sensationalized claims that proliferate in social media and fringe websites.
The key takeaway is that the tragic events of September 11, 2001, were a genuine terrorist attack, not a covert government plot or an engineered collapse. The investigations that followed were meticulous, transparent, and widely peer‑reviewed, and they provide a robust factual foundation that stands up to scrutiny. In an era where misinformation can spread as quickly as any viral video, revisiting and reaffirming the truth—grounded in hard data and corroborated evidence—remains an essential endeavor.
Read the Full Popular Mechanics Article at:
[ https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a66051920/911-myths-debunked/ ]