N※N

South Bend Approves Expanded Surveillance Amid Privacy Concerns

  //science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. expanded-surveillance-amid-privacy-concerns.html
  Published in Science and Technology on Friday, February 20th 2026 at 5:49 GMT by South Bend Tribune
      Locale: Indiana, UNITED STATES

By Anya Sharma, Tribune Staff

SOUTH BEND -- In a move hailed by some as a necessary step to combat rising crime and criticized by others as an overreach of government power, the South Bend Board of Public Safety approved sweeping revisions to the city's surveillance policies on Friday, February 20th, 2026. The changes greenlight the use of advanced technologies like facial recognition, drone surveillance, and expanded license plate reader programs, but with a framework of oversight and data retention limits designed to mitigate privacy concerns.

The decision comes after months of intense debate, punctuated by numerous public forums and a formal review initiated in response to growing anxieties regarding the city's existing surveillance practices. The core challenge, as articulated by board members and community stakeholders, was to strike a delicate balance between enhancing public safety and safeguarding the civil liberties of South Bend residents.

Facial recognition technology, long a subject of controversy, will now be deployed with significant restrictions. The updated policies mandate its use be limited to identifying suspects in serious criminal investigations, excluding minor offenses and general population monitoring. A strict 90-day data retention limit will apply, preventing the accumulation of potentially sensitive biometric data. This limitation aims to address fears of long-term tracking and the creation of a de facto permanent record of citizens' movements. However, critics argue that even 90 days is excessive and opens the door to potential abuse.

Perhaps the most visible change will be the implementation of drone surveillance. While not a blanket authorization for constant aerial monitoring, the policies allow for drone deployment in designated areas and during specific, pre-approved events. Crucially, warrants will be required for any routine surveillance operations, ensuring judicial oversight and preventing arbitrary monitoring. Data captured by drones will also be subject to limited retention periods, mirroring the restrictions on facial recognition data. The city is currently assessing which areas would be considered 'designated' for drone use, with initial discussions focusing on high-crime zones and large public gatherings.

License plate readers (LPRs), already operational in South Bend, will see enhanced data security protocols. The revised policies aim to prevent unauthorized access to collected data and restrict the scope of vehicles tracked. While the technology allows for the monitoring of vehicle movements, the new rules will focus its use on identifying vehicles associated with criminal activity or those reported stolen. The data retention period for LPR data has been capped at 180 days, a compromise between law enforcement's desire for extended tracking capabilities and privacy advocates' calls for more aggressive data deletion.

The public comment period preceding the vote was marked by passionate arguments on both sides. Civil liberties groups, such as the South Bend chapter of the ACLU, voiced strong concerns about the potential for "mission creep," where technologies initially intended for limited use are gradually expanded to encompass broader surveillance activities. They also highlighted the risk of algorithmic bias in facial recognition technology, potentially leading to the misidentification and wrongful targeting of individuals.

Supporters of the revisions, including Board President Reginald Johnson, emphasized the urgent need for modern tools to address rising crime rates, particularly in historically underserved neighborhoods. "We need to be proactive in our approach to public safety," Johnson stated. "These revisions aren't about infringing on anyone's rights; they're about giving our law enforcement officers the resources they need to protect our community." He acknowledged, however, that the policies are not static and pledged ongoing monitoring of their effectiveness and responsiveness to public concerns.

Legal experts predict the new policies will likely face legal challenges. Professor Emily Carter, a specialist in privacy law at Notre Dame Law School, notes, "The devil will be in the details of implementation. While the stated limits on data retention and use are a positive step, the crucial question is whether those limits will be rigorously enforced." She also points to the lack of independent oversight as a potential weakness. "Without a truly independent body to review surveillance activities and investigate complaints, there's a risk that these policies will become a formality rather than a genuine safeguard."

The implementation of these policies represents a significant shift in South Bend's approach to public safety. Whether it ultimately proves to be a successful strategy in reducing crime without unduly infringing on civil liberties remains to be seen. The Board of Public Safety has committed to a six-month review period to assess the impact of the new regulations and make further adjustments as needed.