Science & Technology
Tue, November 25, 2025
Mon, November 24, 2025
Sun, November 23, 2025
Quantum Computing's Two Biggest Hurdles: A 2025 Outlook
//science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. puting-s-two-biggest-hurdles-a-2025-outlook.html
Published in Science and Technology on Monday, November 24th 2025 at 7:38 GMT by The Motley Fool- 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
- 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
Quantum Computing’s Two Biggest Hurdles: A 2025 Outlook
Quantum computing has long been heralded as the next wave of technological progress, promising to solve problems that are intractable for today’s classical supercomputers. Over the past decade, leading research labs and tech giants—IBM, Google, Microsoft, Rigetti, and others—have published groundbreaking results, from demonstrating “quantum supremacy” on a 54‑qubit processor to designing early‑stage quantum software stacks. Yet, as the world edges closer to the era of practical quantum machines, two fundamental challenges continue to loom large: (1) the staggering overhead of quantum error correction, and (2) the difficulty of scaling qubit coherence and connectivity to the thousands‑or‑millions‑of‑qubits required for real‑world applications. This article distills the key points from a recent discussion on The Motley Fool’s “Two Biggest Hurdles for Quantum Computing” and places them in context with current research, industry trends, and the road ahead.
1. Error Correction: The “Price of Quantum Reliability”
Why Error Correction Is So Hard
Quantum bits, or qubits, are notoriously fragile. Even a single stray photon or a tiny vibration can flip a qubit’s state, causing an error that propagates through an algorithm. Unlike classical bits, qubits cannot be duplicated (the no‑cloning theorem) or directly observed without collapsing their quantum state. Consequently, maintaining a reliable quantum computation demands sophisticated error‑detecting and correcting schemes that operate in real time.
The Surface Code and Overhead
The most widely studied scheme today is the two‑dimensional surface code, which encodes a logical qubit into a lattice of many physical qubits. Estimates suggest that to achieve fault‑tolerant error rates (e.g., 10⁻¹² per gate) required for practical applications like factoring large numbers or simulating complex molecules, one may need on the order of 1,000 to 10,000 physical qubits per logical qubit. This leads to a “hardware overhead” that dwarfs the size of current quantum processors.
Recent Progress and Remaining Gaps
In the last few years, researchers have made headway in reducing the overhead. Google’s Sycamore processor demonstrated 53 physical qubits and a noise‑level error rate of ~1%. IBM has been pushing the limits with its 127‑qubit Eagle machine, achieving single‑qubit error rates below 0.1%. However, even the best systems still require additional qubits for syndrome measurement and error‑correction circuitry. Moreover, the error models used in theoretical calculations often assume idealized, time‑independent noise, while real devices exhibit temporally correlated noise and crosstalk that can degrade performance.
What It Means for Companies
Large tech firms are investing heavily in quantum error‑correction research. IBM’s Q System One, for instance, incorporates active cooling and vibration isolation to reduce error rates, while Microsoft’s Azure Quantum platform focuses on hardware‑agnostic error‑correction libraries. Yet, the cost of building and maintaining these systems remains prohibitive for most commercial enterprises. Until error‑correction overhead can be substantially trimmed, quantum computers will likely remain niche research tools rather than mainstream commercial assets.
2. Scaling Qubit Coherence and Connectivity
The Connectivity Bottleneck
Even if error rates are mitigated, quantum algorithms still require a high degree of qubit connectivity. For instance, the quantum Fourier transform or variational quantum eigensolver often need two‑qubit gates between arbitrary qubits. Most physical implementations (e.g., trapped ions, superconducting circuits, photonic platforms) offer limited native connectivity—typically nearest‑neighbor or small‑cluster connectivity. Routing quantum information through a network of swap gates increases circuit depth, thereby compounding errors.
Coherence Time vs. Gate Speed
Coherence time—the time over which a qubit retains its quantum state—is a fundamental limit. Superconducting qubits, the workhorse of most commercial prototypes, have coherence times ranging from 20 µs to a few hundred microseconds. In contrast, trapped‑ion qubits enjoy millisecond‑scale coherence but suffer from slower two‑qubit gate speeds (hundreds of microseconds). Matching these two parameters is essential for efficient algorithms: if gate times are too slow relative to coherence, the computation will decohere before completion.
Recent Advances
Researchers have pushed coherence times in superconducting qubits to ~100 µs, and recently, a joint effort between Google and the University of California, Berkeley, reported a single‑qubit coherence of 2 ms using a “3D transmon” design. Similarly, silicon‑based spin qubits have achieved coherence times exceeding one second, opening a new avenue for scalable, industry‑ready qubit technology. Nevertheless, scaling these platforms to thousands of qubits while preserving coherence and achieving dense connectivity remains a formidable engineering challenge.
The Role of Integrated Photonics
One promising route to high‑density connectivity is integrated photonics. Photonic qubits can, in principle, be routed through waveguides on a chip, offering essentially infinite connectivity without the need for swap operations. Companies like Xanadu and PsiQuantum are developing photonic quantum processors with dozens of qubits, while quantum communication protocols such as teleportation could enable logical qubits to be “moved” across a network. However, photonic systems face their own hurdles—efficient single‑photon sources, low‑loss waveguides, and scalable detectors—which are still under active development.
3. Broader Context and the Road Ahead
Algorithmic and Software Solutions
In parallel with hardware improvements, the quantum software ecosystem is evolving. Hybrid algorithms that interleave quantum and classical steps—such as variational quantum eigensolvers (VQE) and quantum approximate optimization algorithms (QAOA)—are more tolerant of noise and are a realistic target for near‑term devices (the so‑called “Noisy Intermediate‑Scale Quantum,” or NISQ, era). Additionally, quantum error‑mitigation techniques that statistically correct for errors without full error‑correction are being tested on current hardware, offering a stopgap while hardware scales.
Economic and Workforce Implications
The quantum computing industry is a fast‑growing, highly specialized field. Companies are investing billions into research and development, but only a handful of firms can afford to build large‑scale, fault‑tolerant machines. As a result, the talent pipeline—physicists, electrical engineers, computer scientists—is a critical bottleneck. Initiatives such as IBM’s Quantum Education Initiative and Microsoft’s quantum apprenticeship program aim to cultivate the next generation of quantum professionals.
The Bottom Line
Quantum computing is undeniably transformative, but the road from a 50‑qubit lab prototype to a production‑grade quantum computer that can reliably solve real‑world problems is paved with two monumental obstacles: the enormous overhead of error correction and the practical difficulties of scaling qubit coherence and connectivity. Current efforts—from improving superconducting qubit coherence to exploring photonic architectures—are making incremental progress, yet it remains unclear how quickly these hurdles will be overcome. The first commercially viable quantum advantage, if it comes, will likely arise not from a single monolithic machine but from a heterogeneous ecosystem where quantum processors, classical control systems, and advanced error‑mitigation algorithms work in concert. The quantum revolution is still in its early chapters, and the next decade will determine whether it becomes a technological reality or remains an exciting scientific frontier.
Read the Full The Motley Fool Article at:
[ https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/11/24/2-biggest-hurdles-for-quantum-computing/ ]
