N@N

Banning scary-sounding ideas can comfort but does more harm than good

The article from New Scientist discusses the implications of banning or censoring ideas that are perceived as scary or controversial, particularly in the realm of science and technology. It argues that while such bans might provide short-term comfort by reducing public anxiety, they ultimately do more harm than good. The piece highlights several examples where fear-driven censorship has stifled scientific progress, such as the suppression of research on gene editing or AI development. It points out that these bans can lead to a lack of transparency, hinder innovation, and prevent society from preparing for or mitigating potential risks associated with new technologies. The article advocates for open dialogue and education as better alternatives to censorship, suggesting that understanding and managing fear through informed discussion is crucial for responsible scientific advancement and public policy.

Read the Full New Scientist Article at [ https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26435192-600-banning-scary-sounding-ideas-can-comfort-but-does-more-harm-than-good/ ]