N※N

China Prioritizes Technological Self-Reliance Amidst US Tensions

65

  //science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. hnological-self-reliance-amidst-us-tensions.html
  Published in Science and Technology on Tuesday, December 30th 2025 at 6:13 GMT by nbcnews.com

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-30 179 x 224 / 7049 Bytes

2025-12-30 223 x 224 / 9016 Bytes

China Doubles Down on Technological Self-Reliance Amidst US Tensions

China’s ruling Communist Party has issued a strong declaration of intent to aggressively pursue technological independence, signaling a significant escalation in its efforts to reduce reliance on foreign technology – particularly from the United States – and bolster domestic innovation across key sectors. The announcement came during a recent plenary session of the Central Committee for Financial and Economic Affairs, a high-level meeting focused on charting China’s economic course. The move underscores Beijing's determination to overcome ongoing trade restrictions and geopolitical tensions while simultaneously aiming for global leadership in critical technologies.

The core message emanating from the plenum is clear: "self-reliance" (自力更生 – zìlì gèngshēng) in science and technology is now a paramount national priority. This isn't a new concept; China has been pursuing technological advancement for decades, but the current emphasis reflects a heightened sense of urgency fueled by US sanctions and export controls implemented over the past few years. These restrictions, primarily targeting semiconductors and advanced manufacturing equipment, have demonstrably hampered China’s access to crucial components needed for its burgeoning tech industry.

The plenum's communique outlined several key strategies to achieve this ambitious goal. Firstly, it calls for a significant increase in investment in basic research – the foundational scientific inquiry that often yields breakthroughs decades down the line. This contrasts with previous periods where China prioritized applied research and rapid commercialization, sometimes at the expense of fundamental discovery. The focus on basic science is intended to build a more robust and sustainable innovation ecosystem. The communique specifically mentioned strengthening research in areas like quantum computing, artificial intelligence (AI), biotechnology, aerospace technology, and advanced materials – all considered strategically vital for national security and economic competitiveness.

Secondly, China intends to overhaul its intellectual property system. While historically criticized for lax enforcement of IP rights, the plenum signaled a commitment to better protect domestic innovation and attract talent. This includes strengthening patent protection, improving data security regulations (a response to concerns about foreign access to Chinese data), and fostering a more supportive environment for researchers and entrepreneurs. This shift is partly aimed at retaining skilled scientists and engineers who might otherwise be tempted to seek opportunities abroad.

Thirdly, the plan emphasizes cultivating a "dual circulation" economic model. This concept, introduced in 2020, aims to balance domestic demand (internal circulation) with international trade and investment (external circulation). While China remains deeply integrated into global supply chains, the emphasis on internal circulation underscores the desire to build resilience against external shocks and reduce dependence on foreign markets for key technologies. This means fostering a robust domestic market capable of supporting homegrown tech companies and reducing vulnerability to export restrictions.

The US-China technology rivalry is at the heart of this shift. Washington has imposed increasingly stringent controls on exports of advanced semiconductors and related equipment to China, citing national security concerns and aiming to slow Beijing’s technological progress. These actions have prompted a retaliatory response from China, including investigations into US companies operating within its borders and restrictions on certain imports. The plenum's declaration can be seen as a direct response to these pressures, framing them not just as economic challenges but as strategic threats requiring a concerted national effort.

The article highlights the potential difficulties in achieving complete technological self-reliance. While China has made significant strides in areas like 5G technology and AI, it still lags behind the US and other Western nations in several critical fields, particularly in advanced chip manufacturing. Building a fully independent semiconductor industry, for example, requires not only massive investment but also access to specialized equipment and expertise that are currently dominated by companies in Taiwan, South Korea, and the Netherlands – countries that themselves face pressure from the US regarding exports to China.

Furthermore, the plenum’s emphasis on self-reliance could potentially lead to a more closed technological ecosystem within China, hindering international collaboration and slowing down innovation. While the communique acknowledges the importance of international cooperation where possible, the overall tone suggests a prioritization of domestic capabilities. The article also notes that some experts question whether China's current approach – which often involves state-directed investment and industrial policy – is the most efficient way to foster long-term technological advancement.

Finally, the plenum’s decision reflects a broader trend within the Communist Party under Xi Jinping: an increased emphasis on national security and self-sufficiency across all sectors of society. The pursuit of technological independence is not merely about economic competitiveness; it's also seen as crucial for maintaining China’s political stability and asserting its global influence. The commitment to "self-reliance" signals a long-term strategic shift with potentially far-reaching consequences for the global technology landscape and US-China relations.

I hope this article provides a comprehensive summary of the NBC News piece and related context. Let me know if you'd like any adjustments or further elaboration on specific points!