Science & Technology
Mon, August 11, 2025
[ Yesterday Evening ]: Tasting Table
[ Yesterday Evening ]: The Motley Fool
[ Yesterday Evening ]: USA TODAY
[ Yesterday Evening ]: WAFF
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: MassLive
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: earth
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: TechCrunch
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: WSMV
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Tampa Free Press
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: WHIO
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: Business Insider
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: gadgets360
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: New Hampshire Union Leader
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: ABC Kcrg 9
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: breitbart.com
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: The Financial Express
[ Yesterday Afternoon ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: SB Nation
[ Yesterday Morning ]: reuters.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Chowhound
[ Yesterday Morning ]: SB Nation
[ Yesterday Morning ]: ESPN
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Chattanooga Times Free Press
[ Yesterday Morning ]: BBC
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Yesterday Morning ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The Baltimore Sun
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Reuters
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Live Science
[ Yesterday Morning ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Yesterday Morning ]: Impacts
[ Yesterday Morning ]: The West Australian
Sun, August 10, 2025
[ Last Sunday ]: Fox News
[ Last Sunday ]: The Cool Down
[ Last Sunday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Sunday ]: Real Simple
[ Last Sunday ]: Vogue
[ Last Sunday ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Last Sunday ]: The Conversation
[ Last Sunday ]: The Takeout
[ Last Sunday ]: earth
[ Last Sunday ]: newsbytesapp.com
[ Last Sunday ]: Seattle Times
[ Last Sunday ]: Press-Republican, Plattsburgh, N.Y.
[ Last Sunday ]: Las Vegas Review-Journal
[ Last Sunday ]: LA Times
[ Last Sunday ]: indulgexpress
[ Last Sunday ]: The Motley Fool
Sat, August 9, 2025
[ Last Saturday ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Last Saturday ]: Killeen Daily Herald
[ Last Saturday ]: ThePrint
[ Last Saturday ]: TV Technology
[ Last Saturday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Saturday ]: WTAE-TV
[ Last Saturday ]: WSAV Savannah
[ Last Saturday ]: The West Australian
[ Last Saturday ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Last Saturday ]: Chowhound
[ Last Saturday ]: Local 12 WKRC Cincinnati
[ Last Saturday ]: uDiscover
[ Last Saturday ]: WRBL Columbus
[ Last Saturday ]: Telangana Today
[ Last Saturday ]: Forbes
[ Last Saturday ]: The Cool Down
[ Last Saturday ]: The Straits Times
[ Last Saturday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Saturday ]: BBC
[ Last Saturday ]: Seeking Alpha
Fri, August 8, 2025
[ Last Friday ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Last Friday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Friday ]: WBTW Myrtle Beach
[ Last Friday ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Last Friday ]: WVLA Baton Rouge
[ Last Friday ]: Los Angeles Times Opinion
[ Last Friday ]: Democrat and Chronicle
[ Last Friday ]: Patch
[ Last Friday ]: TechRadar
[ Last Friday ]: WNCT Greenville
[ Last Friday ]: Forbes
[ Last Friday ]: The Tennessean
[ Last Friday ]: The Greenville News
[ Last Friday ]: The Conversation
Wed, August 6, 2025
[ Last Wednesday ]: HELLO! Magazine
[ Last Wednesday ]: United Press International
[ Last Wednesday ]: Bring Me the News
[ Last Wednesday ]: WAVY
[ Last Wednesday ]: Los Angeles Times
[ Last Wednesday ]: news4sanantonio
[ Last Wednesday ]: News 8000
[ Last Wednesday ]: San Francisco Examiner
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Atlantic
[ Last Wednesday ]: TheBlast
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Motley Fool
[ Last Wednesday ]: Yen.com.gh
[ Last Wednesday ]: CoinTelegraph
[ Last Wednesday ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Last Wednesday ]: Sports Illustrated
[ Last Wednesday ]: The Financial Express
[ Last Wednesday ]: KHQ
[ Last Wednesday ]: gulfcoastnewsnow.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: Space.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: Ghanaweb.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: WBAY
[ Last Wednesday ]: WLOX
[ Last Wednesday ]: HuffPost
[ Last Wednesday ]: SlashGear
[ Last Wednesday ]: NorthJersey.com
[ Last Wednesday ]: DW
[ Last Wednesday ]: BGR
[ Last Wednesday ]: Business Today
[ Last Wednesday ]: Forbes
[ Last Wednesday ]: STAT
Tue, August 5, 2025
[ Last Tuesday ]: People
[ Last Tuesday ]: Impacts
[ Last Tuesday ]: LA Times
[ Last Tuesday ]: Washington Post
[ Last Tuesday ]: fingerlakes1
[ Last Tuesday ]: Chowhound
[ Last Tuesday ]: Fortune
[ Last Tuesday ]: Indiana Capital Chronicle
[ Last Tuesday ]: Local 12 WKRC Cincinnati
[ Last Tuesday ]: The Clarion-Ledger
[ Last Tuesday ]: moneycontrol.com
[ Last Tuesday ]: WJAX
[ Last Tuesday ]: USA TODAY
[ Last Tuesday ]: Seeking Alpha
Mon, August 4, 2025
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: WYFF
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Men's Fitness
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: The Motley Fool
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Parade
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: HELLO! Magazine
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: The New York Times
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Associated Press
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: WSB-TV
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: reuters.com
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Live Science
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: People
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: sportskeeda.com
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Impacts
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: ThePrint
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: SPIN
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: New Hampshire Bulletin
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: The Cool Down
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: CoinTelegraph
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Defense News
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: NOLA.com
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Forbes
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: ESPN
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: montanarightnow
[ Mon, Aug 04th ]: Phys.org
Sun, August 3, 2025
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Albuquerque Journal, N.M.
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Newsweek
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: KTSM
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: The New Zealand Herald
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Channel NewsAsia Singapore
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Get Spanish Football News
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: KIRO
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Space.com
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Seeking Alpha
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Futurism
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: National Geographic news
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: The Economist
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Source New Mexico
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: The Motley Fool
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: dpa international
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: KRQE Albuquerque
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Pacific Daily News
[ Sun, Aug 03rd ]: Tim Hastings
Sat, August 2, 2025
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: TechCrunch
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: STAT
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Newsweek
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Futurism
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Phys.org
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: The New York Times
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: federalnewsnetwork.com
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: TechRadar
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Star Tribune
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: ThePrint
[ Sat, Aug 02nd ]: Ghanaweb.com
Thu, July 31, 2025
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: New Hampshire Union Leader, Manchester
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: WFMZ-TV
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: WSOC
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: fingerlakes1
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: Investopedia
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: The Economist
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: Seattle Times
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: MSNBC
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: Variety
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: Berkshire Eagle
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: The Cool Down
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: KRQE Albuquerque
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: The Quint
[ Thu, Jul 31st ]: AFP
How Pop Rocks Candy Works, According To Science
//science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. -pop-rocks-candy-works-according-to-science.html
Published in Science and Technology on Monday, August 11th 2025 at 20:51 GMT by Tasting Table🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
Most of us love the surprising (even when you know it's coming) pop and fizzle of pop rocks. The way they work is clever and was discovered by a happy accident.
The Science Behind Pop Rocks: How This Fizzy Candy Creates Explosive Sensations in Your Mouth
Pop Rocks, the iconic candy that crackles and pops on your tongue, has fascinated generations of candy lovers since its commercial debut in the 1970s. But what exactly makes this seemingly simple treat produce such a dramatic reaction? At its core, Pop Rocks is a marvel of food science, combining chemistry, physics, and a bit of culinary ingenuity to deliver an experience that's equal parts fun and fizzy. In this deep dive, we'll explore the origins, mechanics, and myths surrounding Pop Rocks, revealing why it remains a beloved staple in the world of novelty sweets.
The story of Pop Rocks begins in the mid-20th century, rooted in experimental food chemistry. Developed as a side project by a chemist working for a major food corporation, the candy was initially conceived as a way to create an instant carbonated drink. The idea was to dissolve the popping crystals in water to produce a fizzy beverage on demand. However, that concept didn't quite take off, and instead, the invention pivoted to a standalone candy that could be enjoyed directly. By the time it hit store shelves in 1975, Pop Rocks had become an overnight sensation, captivating kids and adults alike with its explosive mouthfeel. Its popularity surged, leading to massive sales and even inspiring copycat products around the globe. Today, it's produced in various flavors like strawberry, watermelon, and tropical punch, but the fundamental formula remains unchanged.
So, how does Pop Rocks actually work? The magic lies in a process involving high-pressure carbonation trapped within a hard candy shell. To make Pop Rocks, manufacturers start with a molten mixture of sugar, lactose (milk sugar), corn syrup, and flavorings. This sugary base is heated to a precise temperature, creating a viscous liquid. Then comes the key step: carbon dioxide gas is introduced under intense pressure—typically around 600 pounds per square inch (psi), which is far higher than the pressure in a typical soda bottle (around 30-50 psi). This pressurized CO2 dissolves into the candy mixture, but as the mixture cools and hardens, the gas gets trapped in tiny bubbles within the candy's crystalline structure. These bubbles are microscopic, often less than a millimeter in diameter, and they're sealed off by the solid candy matrix.
When you pop a handful of these colorful crystals into your mouth, the real show begins. Your saliva, which is mostly water with a bit of enzymes and electrolytes, starts to dissolve the outer layer of the candy. As the hard shell breaks down, it exposes those trapped CO2 bubbles. The sudden release of pressure causes the gas to expand rapidly, creating audible pops and crackles. It's essentially a mini explosion in your mouth—though completely harmless. The sensation is amplified by the fact that the pops happen in quick succession as more bubbles are freed. Interestingly, the temperature of your mouth plays a role too; the warmth helps accelerate the dissolution process, making the reaction feel more intense. This is why Pop Rocks don't pop as vigorously if they're eaten cold or in a dry environment—they need moisture to trigger the release.
From a scientific perspective, this process is a practical demonstration of several principles. It's akin to the nucleation in carbonated drinks, where gas escapes from solution, but here it's controlled and localized. The candy's structure ensures the gas isn't released all at once, prolonging the experience. Chemists often compare it to the way dry ice sublimes or how Mentos react with soda, but Pop Rocks is unique because the carbonation is embedded directly in the edible medium. The amount of CO2 per piece is small—about 0.1 to 0.2 grams per serving—but it's enough to create hundreds of tiny bursts. Safety-wise, there's no risk of over-pressurization in your body; the gas simply escapes as you exhale or swallow, and the candy itself is digestible like any other hard sweet.
Of course, no discussion of Pop Rocks would be complete without addressing the infamous urban legends that have swirled around it for decades. Perhaps the most enduring myth is the tale of a child actor from a popular 1970s cereal commercial who supposedly died after mixing Pop Rocks with soda. The story claimed that the combination caused his stomach to explode from the buildup of gas. This rumor spread like wildfire, fueled by playground gossip and even some media reports, leading to a temporary decline in sales and prompting the manufacturer to launch a public relations campaign to debunk it. In reality, there's no truth to it—the human digestive system is designed to handle far more gas than Pop Rocks could produce, and experiments have shown that even large quantities mixed with carbonated drinks result in nothing more than a fizzy burp. The company even enlisted scientists and celebrities to demonstrate its safety, turning the myth into a marketing opportunity.
Beyond the myths, Pop Rocks has inspired countless experiments and creative uses. Science teachers often use it in classrooms to illustrate concepts like gas solubility, pressure, and chemical reactions. At home, enthusiasts have tried everything from mixing it into ice cream for a popping sundae to incorporating it into baked goods for unexpected texture. There's even a subculture of "extreme" candy eaters who challenge themselves to consume entire bags at once, documenting the intense popping symphony on social media. Nutritionally, Pop Rocks is pure indulgence—mostly sugar with minimal calories per serving (around 25-30 per packet)—but it's not meant to be a health food. Moderation is key, especially for those with sensitivities to artificial flavors or colors.
In recent years, Pop Rocks has seen a resurgence, thanks to nostalgia-driven marketing and its appearance in modern treats like popping boba in bubble tea or infused chocolates. Limited-edition flavors and collaborations with other brands keep it relevant, proving that this fizzy phenomenon isn't just a relic of the past. Whether you're reliving childhood memories or discovering it for the first time, Pop Rocks reminds us of the joy in simple scientific wonders. It's a testament to how innovation in the kitchen can create something timelessly entertaining. Next time you hear that familiar crackle, you'll know it's not magic—it's meticulously engineered fun, one pop at a time.
(Word count: 928)
Read the Full Tasting Table Article at:
[ https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/articles/pop-rocks-candy-works-according-233000858.html ]