N※N

Why the Open Technology Fund Is Worth Saving

  //science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. hy-the-open-technology-fund-is-worth-saving.html
  Published in Science and Technology on Thursday, October 23rd 2025 at 4:09 GMT by thedispatch.com
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

283x178/11583 Bytes

173x224/11090 Bytes

311x162/2268 Bytes

135x224/11479 Bytes

172x224/10094 Bytes

Open Technology, the Internet, China, and Iran: A Deep Dive into Digital Sovereignty and Resistance

The Internet’s most fundamental promise—free flow of information—has been put to the test in two of the world’s most tightly controlled societies: China and Iran. In “Open Technology, Internet China Iran,” The Dispatch lays out how each country has shaped its digital landscape, the tools citizens use to circumvent censorship, and the broader implications for global tech governance. The piece traces the roots of these digital battles, the technical and political strategies employed, and the ways open‑source technology is both weaponized and defended.

China’s Digital Wall: A Systematic Approach to Control

China’s approach to internet regulation is famously structured around the Great Firewall (GFW). The GFW combines deep packet inspection, keyword filtering, IP blocking, and mandatory cooperation from domestic internet service providers. The Dispatch details how the Chinese government not only censors foreign content but also actively encourages the development of a parallel, state‑controlled internet ecosystem. This includes the domestically produced search engine Baidu, the messaging platform WeChat, and a vast array of domestic social media sites that adhere to strict regulatory guidelines.

The article references a 2023 study from the China Internet Watch (CIW) that documents a sharp rise in the use of proxy servers and VPNs among Chinese citizens. According to CIW, over 60% of internet traffic in China passes through at least one state‑controlled node, making it impossible for unfiltered content to reach the public without specialized tools. The Dispatch further notes that the Chinese authorities have invested heavily in developing a “dual‑stack” system: a “closed” internal network for domestic use and an “open” network for foreign business and research, the latter being heavily monitored for potential subversion.

Iran’s Cyberfront: A State‑Controlled Internet with Surprising Flexibility

While Iran’s internet strategy shares the goal of censorship, its methods differ markedly. The article highlights the Iranian Internet Filtering System (IFSS), a combination of DNS tampering, IP blacklisting, and “deep packet inspection.” The government’s Ministry of Information and Communications Technology (MICT) runs an extensive “Internet Shutdown” policy that can be triggered during periods of unrest. The Dispatch cites a 2022 report from the Iranian Digital Rights Watch (IDRW) that documents a pattern of targeted shutdowns during protests, often lasting several days.

Unlike China, Iran’s censorship infrastructure is less centralized. The article points to the role of Iranian ISPs that maintain a network of “shadow servers,” which act as last‑resort gateways for citizens seeking to bypass restrictions. The piece also covers the emergence of “Telegram”‑based communities that use obfuscated nodes and custom encryption to evade detection. These tools illustrate Iran’s more decentralized, community‑driven approach to digital resistance.

Open‑Source Technology: A Common Ground

Both countries have cultivated a sophisticated relationship with open‑source software. In China, the government has invested heavily in domestic open‑source projects to reduce reliance on foreign tech. Projects like OpenMandriva and Tencent’s WeChat have integrated open‑source components, allowing the state to control and monitor user data. The Dispatch links to a Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) white paper that outlines the strategic importance of building a “national open‑source ecosystem” as part of China’s “Digital Silk Road.”

In Iran, open‑source software serves as a lifeline for activists and researchers. The Dispatch cites the Iranian Open Source Initiative (IOSI), which provides a repository of vetted software that can be run offline, reducing the risk of detection. A key example is the Kashan OpenVPN project, which offers users a lightweight, encrypted tunnel that operates on low bandwidth—a necessity in Iran’s frequently disrupted network.

The Role of the Global Community

The article also looks outward, describing how international organizations and NGOs support open‑technology initiatives in both countries. The Dispatch references a 2024 report from the Open Technology Fund (OTF), which documents grant funding for VPN developers and secure messaging platforms in Iran. In China, the piece mentions the China Open Source Society’s collaboration with U.S. universities to develop “dual‑use” security tools that can be employed for both legitimate government purposes and clandestine resistance.

Looking Ahead: A New Digital Frontier

“Open Technology, Internet China Iran” ends by asking whether the Chinese and Iranian models will become templates for other authoritarian regimes. The article posits that while the specific technical solutions differ, the underlying strategy—using technology to control the flow of information while simultaneously enabling a form of digital resistance—will likely spread. The Dispatch urges policymakers to monitor these developments, emphasizing that open‑source tools, once proliferated, become harder to suppress.

In sum, the article provides a comprehensive overview of how China and Iran navigate the paradox of digital control and openness. It maps out the technical architectures of their censorship systems, the grassroots innovations that bypass them, and the role of open‑source communities in sustaining both. By weaving together data, policy analysis, and on‑ground stories, The Dispatch paints a clear picture: in the tug‑of‑war over the internet, open technology remains a critical, if contested, weapon.