N※N

Frimpong-Boateng Refuses NPP Investigation into PDS Deal

  //science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. eng-refuses-npp-investigation-into-pds-deal.html
  Published in Science and Technology on Tuesday, January 20th 2026 at 9:36 GMT by Ghanaweb.com
      Locale: GHANA

Accra, Ghana - January 20th, 2026 - Former Minister for Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation, Professor Kwabena Frimpong-Boateng, has publicly stated he will not participate in any investigation led by a disciplinary committee of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) concerning his involvement in the controversial and ultimately failed PDS concession deal. This refusal, delivered via an interview, marks a significant escalation in the ongoing saga surrounding the deal and raises further questions about accountability within the ruling party.

The PDS debacle, which unfolded several years ago, involved the privatization of Ghana's electricity distribution assets. The deal, intended to modernize the sector and improve efficiency, collapsed amid allegations of irregularities and breaches of contract. The government terminated the concession agreement with PDS, leading to widespread public outcry and calls for a thorough investigation into the process and the roles played by key individuals.

Professor Frimpong-Boateng's initial involvement stemmed from his role as Minister during the deal's inception and early stages. He has since been subject to increasing scrutiny regarding his oversight and decision-making processes related to PDS. Reports recently surfaced suggesting the NPP was establishing a disciplinary committee to investigate his actions and the broader circumstances that led to the collapse of the agreement. These reports prompted the former Minister's strong response.

"I will not appear before any NPP disciplinary committee. I have not been invited, but even if I had been, I would not appear," Frimpong-Boateng declared, demonstrating a firm resolve. His refusal is rooted in a deeply held conviction that the committee is inherently biased and predetermined to find him guilty.

"The committee is already made up of people who have already made up their minds about what they want to do. I don't want to waste my time," he explained, implying a lack of impartiality and a predetermined outcome. This assertion effectively accuses the NPP of a superficial investigation designed to assign blame rather than uncover the truth.

Frimpong-Boateng's statement is particularly noteworthy given the inherent power dynamics at play. As a former high-ranking official within the NPP, his defiance represents a direct challenge to the party's internal processes and its ability to conduct fair and impartial inquiries. While the NPP is likely to face criticism for the perceived lack of due process, the former Minister's decision also complicates matters and potentially hinders any attempt to achieve a transparent resolution to the PDS issue.

The PDS concession deal has been a persistent source of political tension and public distrust. The collapse exposed vulnerabilities in Ghana's privatization processes and highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in public sector transactions. Subsequent investigations, while yielding some insights, have been hampered by political interference and conflicting narratives. Frimpong-Boateng's refusal to cooperate further muddies the waters and adds another layer of complexity to an already challenging situation.

Legal experts suggest that Frimpong-Boateng's refusal, while demonstrating his principles, could potentially have legal ramifications. While he cannot be compelled to appear before a party disciplinary committee, a formal inquiry by a governmental body or court could still require his testimony. The NPP's response to Frimpong-Boateng's statement will be closely watched, as it could influence the public's perception of the party's commitment to accountability and good governance. The incident underscores the ongoing struggle for transparency and responsibility within Ghanaian politics and the difficulties in achieving impartial investigations when dealing with politically sensitive matters.