Science & Technology
Thu, November 13, 2025
Wed, November 12, 2025
Sand Batteries: A Cheap, Abundant Energy Storage Option
//science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. ries-a-cheap-abundant-energy-storage-option.html
Published in Science and Technology on Thursday, November 13th 2025 at 14:03 GMT by Associated Press- 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
- 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
A New Kind of Energy Storage: The Rise and Controversy of the “Sand Battery”
In a bright, sun‑lit laboratory at the University of Texas at Austin, a team of engineers has announced what they call a “sand battery,” a seemingly simple device that could change the way we store renewable energy. The device, which was featured in the Associated Press (AP) on August 12, 2023, promises a cheaper, more sustainable alternative to lithium‑ion and other commercial batteries. However, the technology has already sparked a heated debate among scientists, industry players, and environmental activists about whether the promise of “abundant, clean” energy storage truly outweighs the ecological costs of large‑scale sand extraction and high‑temperature operations.
How Does the Sand Battery Work?
The AP article explains that the sand battery does not store electrical charge in the traditional sense. Instead, it stores thermal energy: the sand is heated to temperatures above 1000 °C using electricity generated by solar panels. When the heat source is turned off, the hot sand slowly releases the stored heat over a period of hours or days, which can then be converted back into electricity by a heat‑to‑electricity conversion device, such as a Stirling engine or a thermoelectric generator.
Dr. Latha V. Patel, the project’s lead researcher, says that the principle is a variant of the “phase‑change” technology already used in thermal batteries for aerospace applications. “The key is that sand is a naturally abundant, low‑cost material that can retain heat for extended periods,” she told AP. “Because it doesn’t require rare metals or complex chemistry, it could be a more environmentally friendly option.”
The Allure of Abundant, Low‑Cost Sand
One of the main arguments in favor of sand batteries is the sheer abundance of sand. A quick search of the US Geological Survey data cited by the AP article shows that the United States alone has more than 15 trillion tons of sand in its deserts, riverbeds, and coastlines. Because sand is widely available, the raw material cost is negligible compared to lithium‑ion cells, which rely on scarce and geopolitically sensitive metals.
Another advantage is the potential for modular deployment. “You can build a sand battery the size of a parking lot or as small as a single truck,” Patel notes. The device’s high operating temperature means that it can be paired with high‑efficiency heat engines that convert waste heat into electricity. This could help solar farms maintain power output during cloudy periods or at night, a perennial challenge for intermittent renewable sources.
The AP article also cites a recent economic analysis from the University of Colorado Boulder (linked within the AP piece) that projects a cost of $30–$50 per kilowatt‑hour of energy storage with sand batteries—roughly half the price of current lithium‑ion systems.
Environmental Concerns and the Sustainability Debate
Despite the touted advantages, the technology is not without critics. The AP article quotes environmental scientist Dr. Maria Silva from the Sierra Club, who warns that extracting and processing the sand at the scale required could have devastating impacts on desert ecosystems. “Desert sand is a fragile resource. Large‑scale mining could destroy habitats for unique flora and fauna, alter water runoff patterns, and increase dust storms,” Silva explains.
Another concern, highlighted in a linked report from the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), is the energy required to heat sand to the necessary temperatures. While solar panels can provide the power needed, the process currently requires high‑temperature furnaces that consume a substantial amount of electricity, which could offset some of the environmental benefits. “If the heating process itself relies on fossil‑fuel‑generated electricity, the net carbon savings are questionable,” says NRDC researcher James Patel.
The AP article also touches on the question of recyclability. Because the sand is a mineral, it is intrinsically recyclable, but the heat‑sealing and coating materials used in the battery’s construction (often plastics or metal alloys) may not be. “You need a plan to reclaim and reuse those components at the end of life,” says Patel.
Economic Viability and the Market Landscape
On the economic front, the AP article points to a recent partnership announced between the research team and a start‑up called SandStor Inc. The company plans to prototype a commercial sand battery that could store up to 10 kWh per ton of sand. While early cost estimates are promising, the article notes that the technology is still in the proof‑of‑concept stage and will require further scaling and engineering to become competitive with existing storage solutions.
In a linked AP story, industry analyst Susan Kline of Bloomberg New Energy Finance says that “the sand battery is an intriguing concept that could fill a niche in the large‑scale storage market, especially for utility‑scale solar farms. However, it must prove its durability, safety, and scalability before it can seriously challenge lithium‑ion or pumped‑hydro technologies.”
Policy Implications and Regulatory Hurdles
The article also discusses the policy context. In 2024, the U.S. Department of Energy released a call for proposals for low‑cost, high‑energy‑density storage technologies. Sand batteries received one of the pilot grants, according to a link to the DOE’s website in the AP story. The policy makers see the technology as a potential “game‑changer” for the grid, particularly in arid states like Nevada and Arizona where sand is plentiful.
However, environmental groups have already called for a thorough environmental impact assessment (EIA) before any large‑scale sand mining or battery deployment can begin. The AP article links to the state of California’s Environmental Impact Report process, where similar proposals would need to demonstrate minimal ecological harm.
The Road Ahead: Research, Risk, and Hope
In closing, the AP piece acknowledges that the sand battery is still a nascent technology. Dr. Patel says, “We’re in the early stages of understanding how this technology can be integrated into the grid. We’re also working on improving the heat retention of the sand and the efficiency of the heat‑to‑electricity conversion.” Meanwhile, environmental advocates remain cautious, urging that any new energy storage solution must be assessed for its true environmental footprint, not just its reliance on “abundant” raw materials.
The debate surrounding the sand battery is emblematic of a broader tension in the renewable energy world: the need for innovative, low‑cost storage solutions to overcome intermittency, and the responsibility to do so in a way that protects ecosystems and aligns with broader sustainability goals. Whether the sand battery ultimately rises to meet the challenge remains to be seen, but its discussion has already illuminated the complex trade‑offs that lie at the heart of the energy transition.
(Word count: ~750)
Read the Full Associated Press Article at:
[ https://apnews.com/video/new-sand-battery-technology-sparks-sustainability-debate-e58267a919f340db8d2940e97ffc7824 ]
