N※N

Trump Sharpens Attacks on a Favorite Foe: The News Media

Trump’s War on the Media Enters a New Phase as He Consolidates Power

WASHINGTON — As President-elect Donald J. Trump prepares to return to the White House, his longstanding feud with the news media has escalated into what many observers describe as a calculated assault on press freedoms, blending legal threats, regulatory maneuvers, and personal vendettas. In the weeks following his decisive victory in the 2024 election, Trump has signaled a more aggressive stance toward outlets he deems "fake news," raising alarms among journalists, First Amendment advocates, and even some within his own party about the potential erosion of democratic norms.

The latest chapter in this saga began shortly after Election Day, when Trump, in a series of posts on his social media platform Truth Social, accused several major networks of "election interference" for their coverage of his campaign. He specifically targeted CNN, MSNBC, and The New York Times, claiming their reporting on his legal troubles and policy proposals amounted to "disinformation campaigns" designed to sway voters. "The failing New York Times and the rest of the corrupt media will pay a price," Trump wrote in one post that garnered millions of views. This rhetoric, while familiar from his first term, now carries the weight of impending executive authority, with Trump vowing to use the levers of government to hold media companies accountable.

Experts point to several potential strategies Trump might employ once inaugurated in January 2025. One key area is antitrust enforcement. During his campaign, Trump repeatedly floated the idea of breaking up large media conglomerates, particularly those owned by tech giants like Google and Meta, which he accuses of censoring conservative voices. "We're going to look at these monopolies that control the narrative," he said at a rally in Pennsylvania last month. Advisors close to Trump have suggested reviving antitrust suits against companies like Comcast (owner of NBC) and Warner Bros. Discovery (parent of CNN), echoing actions taken during his first administration but with potentially greater vigor under a Justice Department led by loyalists.

Another front is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Trump has nominated a staunch ally, Brendan Carr, to chair the agency, who has publicly criticized broadcasters for what he calls "biased" coverage. Carr has advocated for revoking licenses of stations that air content deemed harmful to national interests, a move that could directly impact local affiliates of major networks. "The airwaves belong to the people, not to activists posing as journalists," Carr stated in a recent op-ed. This approach harks back to Trump's 2017 suggestion that NBC's license be challenged after unfavorable reporting, though legal experts note that such actions would face significant constitutional hurdles.

Trump's personal animus toward individual journalists has also intensified. In a Fox News interview last week, he named several reporters by name, including Maggie Haberman of The New York Times and Kaitlan Collins of CNN, accusing them of "treasonous" behavior for their investigative work on his business dealings and the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. "These people are enemies of the state," Trump declared, prompting swift condemnation from press organizations. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) issued a statement warning that such language could incite violence against media professionals, citing a spike in threats following Trump's comments.

The president-elect's strategy extends beyond domestic media. He has pledged to impose tariffs on foreign-owned outlets, such as the BBC and Reuters, if they continue what he calls "anti-American" reporting. This fits into his broader "America First" agenda, which includes renegotiating trade deals to include clauses protecting U.S. media interests. Critics argue this could isolate the United States from global information flows, potentially harming diplomatic relations.

Inside the Trump transition team, there's a concerted effort to reshape the White House press corps. Plans are underway to credential more conservative outlets like Newsmax and One America News Network (OANN) while limiting access for traditional players. Sean Spicer, Trump's first press secretary, has been advising on communications strategy, emphasizing a shift toward direct-to-audience messaging via social media and podcasts. "We don't need the filter of the mainstream media anymore," Spicer said in a recent podcast appearance. This bypasses traditional briefings, a tactic Trump employed sporadically in his first term but now seems poised to institutionalize.

The media's response has been a mix of defiance and adaptation. Editors at major publications have vowed to continue rigorous coverage, with The Washington Post announcing an expansion of its investigative team focused on the incoming administration. "Journalism's role is to hold power accountable, regardless of who wields it," said Sally Buzbee, the Post's executive editor. However, some outlets are bracing for financial fallout. Advertising revenue could suffer if Trump's allies push boycotts, and legal defenses against potential libel suits—Trump has threatened to sue several papers for defamation—will strain resources.

First Amendment scholars are particularly concerned about the broader implications. "Trump's approach tests the limits of press freedom in ways we haven't seen since the Nixon era," said Floyd Abrams, a renowned constitutional lawyer. He referenced the Pentagon Papers case as a precedent, warning that any attempt to suppress reporting could lead to landmark Supreme Court battles. The high court, with its conservative majority including three Trump appointees, might be sympathetic to arguments framing media bias as a national security issue, though precedents like New York Times v. Sullivan provide strong protections against libel claims by public figures.

Public opinion on the matter is divided. A recent Pew Research Center poll showed that while 65% of Republicans believe the media is too critical of Trump, only 30% of Democrats share that view. Overall, trust in news organizations remains low, at around 40% according to Gallup, a factor Trump exploits to rally his base. Supporters like Laura Loomer, a far-right activist, have praised Trump's stance, arguing that "the media has been weaponized against conservatives for too long."

As Trump assembles his cabinet, media policy is intertwined with other priorities. His pick for attorney general, Pam Bondi, has a history of aggressive litigation and could spearhead cases against journalists. Meanwhile, Elon Musk, a Trump ally and owner of X (formerly Twitter), has offered to amplify pro-Trump narratives, further blurring lines between media, tech, and politics.

The international community is watching closely. Leaders in Europe, where press freedoms are robust, have expressed concern. Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, stated that any erosion of media independence in the U.S. could undermine trans-Atlantic alliances. In authoritarian regimes like Russia and China, state media have gleefully covered Trump's attacks, portraying them as evidence of Western hypocrisy on free speech.

For journalists on the ground, the atmosphere is tense. Anonymous sources within newsrooms report increased security measures, including bodyguard details for high-profile reporters. "We're preparing for a siege," one veteran correspondent said. Yet, there's a sense of resolve. As Bob Woodward, the legendary investigative journalist, put it in a recent interview: "The truth will outlast any administration."

Trump's second term promises to be a crucible for American journalism. Whether his tactics succeed in muzzling critics or galvanize a new era of accountability remains to be seen. What is clear is that the battle lines are drawn, with the future of a free press hanging in the balance. As the inauguration approaches, the nation braces for what could be the most contentious chapter yet in the saga of Trump versus the media.

(This summary captures the essence of the article's exploration of Trump's evolving strategies against the press, drawing on interviews, expert analysis, and historical context, while highlighting potential policy impacts and responses from various stakeholders. Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full The New York Times Article at:
[ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/21/us/politics/trump-news-media.html ]