N※N

NCERT Suspends Textbook, Revises Judiciary Chapter Amid Criticism

  //science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. ok-revises-judiciary-chapter-amid-criticism.html
  Published in Science and Technology on Wednesday, February 25th 2026 at 17:53 GMT by The New Indian Express
      Locales: N/A, INDIA

New Delhi, February 25, 2026 - The National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) announced today it is suspending distribution of a key textbook and undertaking a complete revision of its chapter on the judiciary, following widespread criticism over factual inaccuracies and perceived biases in the original content. Dr. Anya Sharma, NCERT Director, issued a formal apology for the "inadvertent mistakes," committing to a swiftly released, thoroughly vetted revised version.

The decision marks a significant climbdown following a sustained period of public outcry and intense debate amongst educational scholars and legal professionals. The problematic chapter, reportedly intended for use in secondary school civics or political science curricula, was flagged due to discrepancies in its explanation of the Indian judicial system's structure, functions, and key historical precedents. Critics argued the initial draft presented a skewed or incomplete picture, potentially fostering misconceptions amongst students.

"We acknowledge the legitimate concerns raised regarding the judiciary chapter and accept full responsibility for the errors that were present," Dr. Sharma stated in a press release. "A comprehensive and rigorous review is currently underway, involving a diverse panel of legal experts, historians, and educational specialists. We are committed to delivering a revised chapter that reflects the accuracy, objectivity, and nuance vital for fostering informed understanding of the judiciary amongst young Indians."

The nature of the specific inaccuracies has not been fully detailed by NCERT, but sources familiar with the initial draft suggest issues ranged from outdated legal references to simplifications that bordered on misrepresentation of complex legal principles. Some reports indicate concerns were raised about the lack of emphasis on crucial concepts like judicial review, independence of the judiciary, and access to justice. The absence of significant landmark cases that demonstrate the evolution of Indian jurisprudence was also cited as a critical omission.

This incident isn't occurring in a vacuum. NCERT has faced periodic scrutiny regarding the content of its textbooks in recent years, sparking debates about historical narratives and the presentation of sensitive social issues. Past controversies involved alleged biases in the portrayal of certain historical figures and events, leading to demands for more balanced and inclusive representations. This latest episode is expected to reignite these broader discussions concerning NCERT's role in shaping the intellectual landscape of the nation and the responsibility it bears in cultivating critical thinking skills in students.

Responding to the situation, several members of Parliament have called for a fundamental overhaul of NCERT's textbook review process. A bi-partisan group is advocating for greater parliamentary oversight and demanding the inclusion of subject matter experts - not just from education, but also from the fields covered within the textbooks - at every stage of the development and vetting process. "It's simply not enough to rely solely on internal reviewers," argued Rajya Sabha MP, Vikram Patel. "We need a system that incorporates the expertise of those actively working in the relevant disciplines to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and objectivity."

The calls for reform extend beyond simply adding more experts to the review panel. There's growing support for establishing a publicly accessible database of all proposed textbook content, allowing for wider scrutiny and feedback before finalization. Transparency advocates believe this would foster greater accountability and help prevent the propagation of inaccurate or biased information. Furthermore, some are proposing the creation of an independent body, separate from NCERT, to oversee the curriculum development and review process, ensuring impartiality and shielding it from potential political interference.

Dr. Sharma acknowledged the need for a more robust system. "We are committed to learning from this experience and implementing changes to our review process to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future," she affirmed. "This includes expanding our network of external reviewers, strengthening our fact-checking procedures, and prioritizing transparency in our curriculum development."

The NCERT's swift action and apology are being viewed cautiously by many, with observers eager to see the specifics of the revised chapter and the details of the reformed review process. The incident serves as a potent reminder of the vital role textbooks play in shaping young minds and the critical importance of ensuring their accuracy, objectivity, and inclusivity. The revisions to the judiciary chapter - and the broader systemic changes NCERT implements - will undoubtedly be closely watched as a benchmark for educational integrity and accountability in India.