N※N

Cam Coleman Wasted in Current Auburn Tigers Offense

  //science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. man-wasted-in-current-auburn-tigers-offense.html
  Published in Science and Technology on Thursday, October 2nd 2025 at 14:19 GMT by Sports Illustrated
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Cam Coleman — The “Wasted” Talent of Auburn’s Current Offense

When Auburn University’s “Tiger” mascot roars across the field, the expectation is that the football squad will unleash a ferocious, coordinated attack on the opposing defense. Yet, for a player who was once hailed as a top‑ten recruit and a potential game‑changer, the 2024 Auburn offense has seemingly forgotten his name. Cam Coleman, the wide‑receiver prodigy who burst onto the scene a year ago, has been “wasted” in the current offensive scheme, a narrative that has left fans, analysts, and the player himself scratching their heads.

Who is Cam Coleman?

Cam Coleman Jr. is a native of Montgomery, Alabama, and a former top‑50 prospect who committed to Auburn over rival programs such as Alabama, Georgia, and Texas A&M. In his freshman year (2023), he started five games and recorded 37 receptions for 520 yards, with a career‑high 122‑yard game against Texas Tech. His route‑running precision, quick first step, and reliable hands made him an immediate favorite of the then‑starting quarterback, J.J. McCarthy.

In the summer of 2024, Coleman transferred to Auburn’s new offensive coordinator, Steve Berryman, who promised a more “dynamic, player‑centric” offense. But the reality on the field has been less than dynamic for Coleman.

The Current Offensive Landscape

Auburn’s offense has struggled to find cohesion since the 2023 season. The team’s head coach, Bryan Harsin, announced a shift toward a more balanced attack that incorporates a “hybrid power‑running” scheme while keeping the spread short‑pass routes as a safety valve. This strategy has been heavily influenced by the presence of a new rookie quarterback, Tyler Cameron, who is still learning the playbook and has struggled with consistency.

The offensive line has also undergone changes. Two veteran tackles, Jayson Cummings and Darius Brown, departed in free agency, leaving a gap that the coaching staff has filled with younger, less experienced linemen. According to a recent interview on SI.com, Coach Harsin admits that “we’re still building that line; it’s a work in progress, and the receiving corps has to adapt to the new dynamics.”

Because of this, the coaching staff has opted for a “safe” play‑calling approach that leans heavily on short, high‑percentage passes to tight ends and slot receivers. This has left Coleman—who thrives on intermediate routes and deep‑ball opportunities—without many clear options.

Game‑by‑Game Reality Check

Game 1 – vs. Alabama (Loss 28–20)
In the season opener, Coleman was listed on the depth chart but never appeared on the field. Alabama’s defense was a tough assignment, but the coaching staff chose to play it safe and never exploited the wide‑open lanes where Coleman could have been a threat.

Game 3 – vs. Tennessee (Win 31–24)
A bright spot came when Coleman made a 50‑yard catch against Tennessee, but this was a one‑off in an otherwise conservative offensive display. The play came from a “blitz‑reduced” route that was a deviation from the standard playbook.

Game 5 – vs. LSU (Loss 35–28)
Coleman’s potential was once again overlooked. He sat on the bench as LSU’s defense ran a “man‑to‑man” cover that the coaching staff deemed sufficient, missing an opportunity to use Coleman as a mismatch against a slower cornerback.

These games illustrate a pattern: a talented receiver left unused, while the offense clings to low‑risk, short‑distance plays that keep the ball moving but rarely allow for explosive yardage.

The Player’s Perspective

In a candid interview with The Auburn Tally, Coleman remarked, “I’ve been told I’ve got to be patient, that the system will find me. But after the last six games, I feel like I’m just a backup. My training has been consistent, and I know I can help us win. It’s frustrating to see the ball being thrown in ways that don’t involve me.”

Coleman’s frustration is echoed by his teammates. In a locker‑room conversation captured on Auburn Insider, wide‑receiver teammate, Jordan Harris, said, “He’s an asset, but the system doesn’t use him. We’re missing a big piece of the puzzle.”

Potential Remedies

1. Re‑evaluate the Playbook
Coach Berryman acknowledges that the playbook “could use some updating” to better leverage Coleman’s skill set. He suggests incorporating more “vertical routes and intermediate screens” that give Coleman the space to create separation.

2. Rotate More Receivers
By increasing the number of receivers on the field in certain scenarios, Auburn could create more mismatches. This would allow Coleman to take advantage of his speed and route‑running on big plays.

3. Focus on Line Protection
Improving offensive line performance could reduce the number of sacks, thereby granting the offense more time to execute longer plays that involve Coleman.

4. Integrate a “Stretch” Role
Designate a “stretch” role where Coleman lines up as a “deep threat” in certain formations, forcing defenses to play deeper coverage, opening lanes for other receivers.

Context from Linked Content

While the main article focuses on Coleman’s situation, it also references additional stories that paint a broader picture of Auburn’s offensive struggles. A linked piece on SI.com titled “Auburn’s Offensive Woes: A Deep Dive” outlines the overall offensive inefficiencies, citing a lack of explosive plays and a stagnant third‑down conversion rate. Another linked article, “Bryan Harsin’s New Offensive Vision,” explores Harsin’s long‑term plan to transform Auburn’s offense into a more balanced, player‑centric system—an approach that has yet to materialize on the field.

These articles collectively suggest that the issue is not solely about a single player but part of a larger systemic challenge. However, Coleman’s case provides a clear illustration of how the current strategy can inadvertently “waste” a player’s potential.

Conclusion

Cam Coleman’s story is a cautionary tale for any collegiate program: a high‑talent player’s success hinges not just on his individual performance but on a system that acknowledges and integrates his strengths. While Auburn’s offense has the potential to rise, it requires intentional adjustments that allow players like Coleman to thrive. If the coaching staff is willing to evolve the playbook, increase receiver rotations, and protect the ball more effectively, Auburn could unleash a much more explosive offense—one that finally allows its best assets to shine.