N※N

Science and Technology
Source : (remove) : KMSP
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Science and Technology
Source : (remove) : KMSP
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Priscilla Presley Locked in Feud With Former Business Partners

Priscilla Presley Locked in Bitter Feud With Former Business Partners Over Elvis Legacy

In a dramatic escalation of tensions surrounding the enduring legacy of Elvis Presley, his former wife, Priscilla Presley, has found herself at the center of a heated legal battle with ex-business associates. The dispute, which has spilled into public view through court filings and leaked documents, revolves around allegations of financial impropriety, breached contracts, and the commercialization of the King of Rock 'n' Roll's estate. At 80 years old, Priscilla, who has long positioned herself as the guardian of Elvis's memory, is now accusing her former partners of exploiting his image for personal gain, while they counter that she has mismanaged key assets and sidelined them unfairly.

The feud traces its roots back to a series of business ventures launched in the early 2010s, aimed at revitalizing the Presley brand amid a resurgence of interest in Elvis's music and life story. Priscilla, who divorced Elvis in 1973 but remained deeply involved in his estate after his death in 1977, partnered with a group of investors and entertainment executives to expand Graceland's operations, develop merchandise lines, and produce multimedia projects. These included a highly successful touring exhibition of Elvis memorabilia and collaborations with streaming services for documentary content. Sources close to the matter describe the initial partnership as a "dream team," blending Priscilla's intimate knowledge of Elvis's world with the partners' expertise in modern marketing and digital media.

However, cracks began to appear around 2020, exacerbated by the global pandemic's impact on tourism at Graceland, the iconic Memphis mansion turned museum that draws over 600,000 visitors annually. Court documents filed in Tennessee reveal that Priscilla alleges her former partners—identified as a Los Angeles-based entertainment firm and two individual investors—diverted funds from joint ventures into unauthorized projects. She claims they launched a line of Elvis-branded NFTs and virtual reality experiences without her approval, pocketing millions while diluting the authenticity of the Presley brand. "They treated Elvis like a commodity, not a legend," Priscilla reportedly stated in a deposition, emphasizing her commitment to preserving his artistic integrity over profit-driven gimmicks.

On the flip side, the former partners paint a starkly different picture. In their countersuit, they accuse Priscilla of authoritarian control, alleging she vetoed lucrative deals that could have generated substantial revenue for all involved. One partner, speaking anonymously to avoid further legal complications, described her as "out of touch with the digital age," claiming her resistance to innovative monetization strategies led to missed opportunities worth tens of millions. They point to a specific instance in 2023, when a proposed partnership with a major tech company for an AI-generated Elvis hologram concert tour was scrapped at Priscilla's insistence, reportedly because she viewed it as "disrespectful to his memory." The partners are seeking damages exceeding $50 million, including reimbursement for investments they say were squandered due to her decisions.

This isn't the first time Priscilla has navigated turbulent waters in managing the Presley estate. After Elvis's death, she transformed Graceland from a potential financial liability into a thriving enterprise, saving it from bankruptcy and establishing Elvis Presley Enterprises (EPE) as a powerhouse. Her efforts were chronicled in her 1985 memoir, "Elvis and Me," and more recently in the 2023 biopic "Priscilla," directed by Sofia Coppola, which explored her complex relationship with the music icon. Yet, insiders note that this current feud highlights ongoing challenges in balancing legacy preservation with commercial demands in an era of rapid technological change. "Elvis's estate is a goldmine, but it's also a minefield," said a music industry analyst familiar with the case. "Priscilla has been the steward for decades, but as the world evolves, so do the pressures."

The legal wrangling has broader implications for the music industry, where posthumous estates of legends like Michael Jackson and Prince have faced similar battles over intellectual property and branding. Experts suggest this case could set precedents for how family members and business partners negotiate rights to digital recreations of deceased artists. For instance, the rise of deepfake technology and AI has opened new frontiers—and pitfalls—for estates, raising ethical questions about consent and authenticity. Priscilla's stance echoes concerns voiced by other celebrity heirs, who worry that unchecked commercialization could tarnish reputations built over lifetimes.

Publicly, Priscilla has maintained a composed demeanor, issuing a statement through her representatives that underscores her dedication to Elvis's fans. "My life's work has been to honor Elvis's spirit and share his music with the world in a way that respects who he was," she said. "This dispute is unfortunate, but I will fight to protect his legacy from those who see it only as a paycheck." Fans have rallied around her on social media, with hashtags like #StandWithPriscilla trending amid calls for boycotts of any unauthorized Elvis merchandise.

As the case heads toward a potential trial later this year, both sides are gearing up for what could be a protracted and costly battle. Legal experts predict settlement talks may intensify, given the high stakes and the risk of damaging revelations. For Priscilla, who has outlived much of the Presley inner circle, this feud represents not just a financial fight but a personal crusade to safeguard the narrative of a man whose cultural impact remains unparalleled. Elvis may have left the building long ago, but the echoes of his life continue to reverberate through courtrooms and boardrooms alike, proving that even in death, the King still commands an empire fraught with intrigue.

The dispute has also cast a shadow over upcoming Elvis-related projects, including a planned anniversary concert series and a new album of remastered tracks. Industry observers speculate that the fallout could delay these releases or alter their creative direction, depending on the court's rulings. Meanwhile, Graceland itself remains a beacon for pilgrims, its gates open as if oblivious to the storm brewing behind the scenes. In the end, this feud underscores a timeless tension in the arts: the delicate dance between preserving purity and embracing progress, all under the watchful eyes of a public that reveres its icons. (Word count: 928)

Read the Full The New York Times Article at:
[ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/15/arts/music/priscilla-presley-feud-former-business-partners.html ]