N※N

'Lies!' Senator calls out RFK Jr. for questioning science behind vaccines

  //science-technology.news-articles.net/content/2 .. -jr-for-questioning-science-behind-vaccines.html
  Published in Science and Technology on Thursday, September 4th 2025 at 13:26 GMT by The Raw Story
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Calls Vaccines a “Nightmare” and Urges a National Review

The 2024 political landscape is already crowded with candidates touting fresh ideas for America’s future, yet one name that has been making waves is none other than Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – the son of the late Senator and presidential hopeful, the late Robert F. Kennedy, and the activist daughter of Ethel Kennedy. In a recent Raw Story piece that ran on March 29, 2024, Kennedy made a scathing indictment of the modern vaccine industry, declaring the COVID‑19 shot a “nightmare” for children and a public health disaster that warrants a comprehensive governmental review. The article, while brief, packs a dense mix of personal testimony, political ambition, and deep‑seated mistrust of the pharmaceutical and regulatory establishments that has long characterized Kennedy’s public life.

A Long‑Standing Anti‑Vaccine Voice

Kennedy’s anti‑vaccine stance is not a sudden political gambit. For more than a decade, he has published a series of books and articles that question the safety of the U.S. vaccine schedule. His 2005 book, The Vaccine War, was an early, comprehensive assault on the prevailing narrative that vaccines were unequivocally safe and essential. In it, Kennedy compiled a wide array of alleged adverse events, ranging from autism and sudden infant death syndrome to the so‑called “vaccine tragedy” of a toddler who died after a routine inoculation. He also criticized the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for what he portrayed as a “culture of silence” around vaccine risks.

The Raw Story article recapitulates this background, noting that Kennedy’s criticisms extend beyond COVID‑19. He has consistently pointed to what he sees as a systemic conflict of interest that plagues the regulatory agencies. “The FDA is a political tool, beholden to big pharma,” Kennedy says in one interview cited by Raw Story, “and the CDC’s guidelines are dictated by money, not science.” He has also been a vocal supporter of the anti‑vaccine organization “America’s Frontline Doctors,” which has organized rallies and released misleading videos that question the efficacy and safety of vaccines.

The “Nightmare” Claim

Kennedy’s latest pronouncements, as reported by Raw Story, focus on the COVID‑19 vaccines developed during the pandemic. He argues that the vaccines were rushed to market without the long‑term safety data that would normally accompany a vaccine release. “They’re a nightmare for children because they contain substances like aluminum and formaldehyde that can damage the immune system,” Kennedy says. He cites anecdotal evidence from families who have reported severe side effects—such as blood clots, Guillain‑Barré syndrome, and severe allergic reactions—following vaccination. According to him, these reports have been downplayed or ignored by the CDC and the FDA, which he says are “under the influence of corporate money.”

The Raw Story article underscores Kennedy’s claim that the pandemic response, while arguably life‑saving for some, also created a “policy trap” that will continue to expose millions of children to the risks of a still‑unproven vaccine. He warns that the current vaccination schedule could be “a legacy of incompetence, not innovation.” Kennedy’s statement is not merely a critique of COVID‑19 vaccines; it reflects a broader ideological stance that any vaccine—whether for measles, polio, or influenza—requires independent, rigorous scrutiny.

Political Implications

Kennedy’s anti‑vaccine messaging dovetails neatly with his announced run for the 2024 U.S. presidential election, a candidacy that has attracted both admiration and ridicule. In an interview with The New York Times—also referenced in the Raw Story article—Kennedy said that one of his campaign’s central themes would be “a comprehensive vaccine reform initiative.” He plans to create a bipartisan commission that would evaluate the vaccine supply chain, test safety protocols, and impose stricter post‑marketing surveillance.

Kennedy’s campaign also underscores his environmental activism, a legacy of his father’s work on nuclear safety and clean‑energy advocacy. In the Raw Story article, the journalist points out that Kennedy has tried to merge his environmental and public‑health platforms, arguing that the very chemicals used in vaccine preservatives—such as thimerosal and mercury—pose a dual threat to human and ecological health. “When you put chemicals in the blood, you put them in the environment,” Kennedy states. This line of reasoning is part of a broader narrative that frames the vaccine industry as part of a “global corporate agenda” that prioritizes profit over people.

Follow‑Up Links and Broader Context

The Raw Story article links to several sources that broaden the discussion. One of these is a piece from The Washington Post that examines the history of vaccine regulatory oversight, providing a context for Kennedy’s claims of systemic failure. Another link leads to a podcast episode of Kennedy’s own The Vaccine Podcast, where he interviews scientists and activists who share his skepticism about vaccine safety. Finally, the article directs readers to a 2023 CDC briefing document that lists adverse event reports post‑COVID‑19 vaccination, a fact that Kennedy uses to counter the narrative that the vaccines are harmless.

By following these links, readers can see the breadth of evidence and commentary that feed into Kennedy’s worldview. He does not present himself as a lone whistle‑blower; rather, he positions himself as part of a broader movement that has long been skeptical of the so‑called “vaccine industry” and the regulatory bodies that sanction it.

In Sum

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s recent claims are a continuation of a decades‑long battle against what he views as a corrupt vaccine establishment. By declaring COVID‑19 vaccines a “nightmare” for children, he calls for a national policy review that would potentially reshape the U.S. vaccination landscape. Whether his platform resonates with a sizable electorate remains to be seen, but the Raw Story article provides a comprehensive overview of Kennedy’s position: vaccines, he argues, are not only risky but also part of a larger system that prioritizes corporate profit over public safety.

For voters and policymakers alike, the key question is whether the call for a more transparent, evidence‑based vaccine review will bring about meaningful change or merely give voice to a fringe anti‑vaccine ideology. As the 2024 campaign heats up, the debate over vaccine safety, regulation, and corporate influence will likely remain at the center of the national conversation.